Serious Accidents Punishment Act Response Checklist and Safety and Health Management System Guide

Responding to the Serious Accidents Punishment Act is not merely about verifying punishment after an accident occurs, but is a prevention-oriented management activity that involves establishing a safety and health management system on a regular basis and checking its implementation.

 


Key Summary

item

Items to check by the person in charge

Law name

Act on the Punishment, etc. of Serious Accidents

Main purpose

Prevention of serious industrial and civil accidents, and strengthening of safety and health obligations for business owners and management

Subject to review for application

Check applicability primarily for workplaces with 5 or more regular employees

Core obligations

Establishment and implementation of safety and health management system, measures to prevent recurrence of accidents, and management of compliance with relevant laws and regulations

Key Inspection Items

Safety and health goals and management policies, organization, personnel, and budget, risk assessment, listening to employee opinions, management of contracting, services, and outsourcing, emergency response manuals

Practical Core

Management of actual implementation and inspection records, rather than document creation

Key Personnel

Executives, Safety and Health Officers, HR Managers, Supervisors, Site Managers

Supporting documents

Safety and health objectives, budget execution data, risk assessment forms, corrective action records, training materials, meeting minutes, checklists

caution

Punishment is not automatically imposed simply because a serious accident has occurred; instead, the violation of the duty to ensure safety and health and the causal relationship are reviewed together.

 

The Serious Accidents Punishment Act is not merely a law that prescribes punishment after an accident; rather, it requires employers and management to establish and actually operate a safety and health management system to prevent serious accidents. HR and safety and health managers must jointly review the applicability of the law, the reporting system to management, risk assessments, safety and health budgets, management of contracting, services, and outsourcing, and accident response manuals.

 


What is the Serious Accidents Punishment Act?

The Serious Accidents Punishment Act is a law that holds business owners or management responsible when serious industrial or civil accidents occur due to a violation of their duty to ensure safety and health. In this article, [the topics] frequently checked by corporate HR and safety and health managers Major Industrial Accidents and Safety and Health Management System We will organize it centering on...

 

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, a serious industrial accident refers to an accident that meets certain criteria, such as the occurrence of a fatality, injuries requiring treatment for a certain period, or occupational diseases caused by the same hazardous factor.

 

The key to responding to the Serious Accidents Punishment Act is not merely verifying “how punishment is imposed if an accident occurs.” What is more important is establishing a system that can explain whether our organization identified risk factors, made improvements, designated personnel, executed budgets, listened to employee opinions, and managed contracted, outsourced, and subcontracted work even before the accident occurred.

 

division

explanation

serious accidents

A concept including major industrial accidents and major civil accidents

Major industrial accidents

Industrial accidents that meet certain criteria, such as death, serious injury, or occupational disease

Obligation to ensure safety and health

Obligations that business owners or management executives must fulfill to prevent accidents

Safety and Health Management System

A management system for identifying risk factors, improving, budgeting, managing personnel, operating procedures, conducting inspections, and maintaining records.

 

Therefore, responding to the Serious Accidents Punishment Act is not the sole responsibility of the legal or safety and health teams. Executive decision-making, HR training and personnel management, implementation by field managers, and management support budget and contract management must all be interconnected.

 


Who needs to check?

Responding to the Serious Accidents Punishment Act is not a task that can be handled by a single safety and health manager. It requires the coordinated operation of decision-making by management, implementation at each workplace, training and workforce management by HR, and budget and contract management by business support.

 

manager

Things to check

Executive

Decision-making regarding safety and health objectives and management policies, personnel and budget allocation, and improvement of major risk factors

Safety and Health Officer

Risk assessment, safety and health management system inspection, accident prevention measures, training operation

HR Manager

Safety and health training, supervisor training, management of affected personnel, post-accident employee support

Management Support Manager

Safety and health budget, purchase of protective equipment and facilities, management of subcontracting, service, and outsourcing contracts

Supervisor

Supervision and control of on-site workers, pre-work safety measures, and reporting of risk factors

Site manager

Inspection of actual work environment, execution of work suspension, evacuation, and emergency measures

Partner company representative

Implementation of safety and health standards for contracted, service, and outsourced work

Workers/Employees

Reporting risk factors, complying with safety regulations, and providing suggestions for improvement

 

In particular, even for workplaces with a small number of regular employees, if work involving accident risks—such as manufacturing, construction, logistics, facility management, research institutes, hospitals, or on-site services—is performed, it is necessary to practically inspect whether a safety and health management system has been established.

 


Procedures that the person in charge must check

1. Check the applicability of the law and the scope of the workplace.

First, you must check whether your company is subject to the Serious Accidents Punishment Act. Currently, the Serious Accidents Punishment Act stipulates that the chapters related to serious industrial accidents do not apply to business owners and management executives of businesses or workplaces with fewer than 5 regular employees.

 

Confirmation items

Reasons why you need to check

Number of regular employees

Basic criteria for determining the applicability of the law

Number of workplaces

Verify the scope of management for headquarters, branches, factories, sites, etc.

Actual tasks performed

Check if the work is office-oriented or if there is field, equipment, logistics, or facility work.

Whether it is a contract, service, or entrustment

Verify whether external personnel are working at our workplace or in our tasks

Whether or not construction work

Confirmation of construction cost, roles of ordering and construction, and site management responsibilities

Work where serious industrial accidents are likely to occur

Identify risk factors such as entrapment, falls, chemicals, electric shock, suffocation, overwork, and heatwaves.

 

In practice, it is dangerous to conclude that there is no responsibility for safety and health management solely on the grounds that "our company has a large number of office workers" or "subcontractors handle the work." The review must be conducted based on the risks that may arise in the business or workplace that the company actually controls, operates, or manages.

 


2. Establish the safety and health objectives and management policies of the management responsible.

The starting point of a safety and health management system is the clear goals and policies of management. If there are no safety and health goals, or if there are only declarations without an action plan, it is difficult to regard it as an actual implementation system.

 

item

Examples of practical application

Safety and Health Objectives

Zero fatal accidents, improvement rate for high-risk work, risk assessment completion rate, etc.

Management Policy

The principle of managing safety as a management standard, not a cost.

Execution plan

Annual Safety and Health Plan, Departmental Tasks, Improvement Schedule

Designation of a person in charge

Safety and Health General Manager, Site Managers, Supervisors

Reporting system

Regular management reporting, emergency reporting channels for accidents and risks

 

Goals and policies must not remain mere text for posting. They must be linked to budget, personnel, training, risk assessment, and corrective measures to function as an actual management system.

 


3. Check key items of the safety and health management system.

The Enforcement Decree of the Serious Accidents Punishment Act sets forth specific details regarding the establishment of a safety and health management system and implementation measures. In practice, it is recommended to create an internal checklist based on the items below.

 

Inspection items

Items to check by the person in charge

Safety and Health Objectives and Management Policy

Documentation status, sharing status with members, management approval status

Dedicated organization or person in charge

Whether an organization or person in charge has been designated to oversee and manage safety and health affairs

Identification and improvement of hazardous and risk factors

Risk assessment, on-site inspection, corrective measures, and inspection at least once every six months

Budget formulation and execution

Whether costs for protective equipment, facility improvements, training, safety equipment, and health management are reflected

Authority of Safety and Health Managers, etc.

Whether the necessary authority and budget have been granted to the manager and supervisor

Placement of safety managers, health managers, etc.

Whether legally required personnel have been appointed and duties performed

Listening to employee opinions

Collection of worker opinions, Occupational Safety and Health Committee, operation of suggestion and reporting channels

Emergency Response Manual

Establish procedures for work suspension, evacuation, relief measures, and prevention of further damage

Management of contracts, services, and entrustment

Establishment of subcontractor selection criteria, safety and health costs, work period, and inspection standards

 

What is important here is not merely whether “documents exist,” but whether “it was actually implemented.” For example, even if a risk assessment checklist exists, if corrective measures are delayed, a budget is not allocated, and the person in charge is unable to report, it is difficult to consider the system to be functioning.

 


4. Link risk assessment and corrective measures

The most critical practical step in responding to the Serious Accidents Punishment Act is identifying and improving hazardous and dangerous factors. The Ministry of Employment and Labor's explanatory guide also explains that it is important to identify hazardous and dangerous factors through accident history, employee opinions, accident cases in the same industry, and expert assessments, and to establish improvement procedures.

 

step

Action by the person in charge

Identify risk factors

On-site inspections, accident and near-miss records, employee feedback, work process verification

Risk assessment

Frequency and intensity assessment, classification of high-risk tasks

Establishment of improvement measures

Removal, replacement, engineering measures, administrative measures, provision of protective equipment

Budget reflection

Budgeting for facility improvements, protective gear, safety equipment, and training costs

Execution check

Verify completion status of improvement, person in charge, deadline, photos, or records

Re-evaluation

Confirmation of changes in risk levels after improvement

Management Report

Report on major risks and budget/personnel requirements

 

Risk assessments should not be prepared merely for paperwork, but should be used as decision-making data to reduce actual risks. In particular, recurring near misses, musculoskeletal strain, risks of electric shock, fire, suffocation, falls, and entrapment, customer verbal abuse and emotional labor, and risks of overwork must be checked regularly.

 


5. Manages contract, service, and outsourcing tasks.

A frequently overlooked aspect in responding to the Serious Accidents Punishment Act is contracted, outsourced, and consigned work. When external personnel work within a company's business premises or workplace—such as in cleaning, security, facility management, logistics, equipment maintenance, construction, IT maintenance, or outsourced production—safety and health management standards must be verified.

 

Management Items

Things to check

vendor selection criteria

Industrial accident prevention capability, safety management experience, and availability of personnel and equipment

Contract Terms

Reflection of safety and health standards, protective equipment, right to stop work, and reporting obligations

Safety and health costs

Reflecting costs for safety facilities, protective equipment, training, and work environment improvement

pre-work consultation

Sharing work scope, risk factors, access routes, and emergency contact network

joint inspection

Inspections before, during, and after work, verification of risk factor improvement

Incident Response

Procedures for reporting, relief, evacuation, and prevention of further damage in the event of an accident

Record management

Retention of meeting minutes, checklists, training materials, photos, and records of corrective actions

 

It is difficult to simply conclude that "it is not our responsibility" regarding contracted, outsourced, or consigned work because the workers are external employees. In practice, safety and health standards must be incorporated from the contract stage, and risk factor inspections and corrective measures must be documented even during actual work.

 


6. Prepare a manual for accidents and imminent danger situations.

While the core of responding to the Serious Accidents Punishment Act is accident prevention, a manual for immediate response in the event of an accident or imminent danger is also required.

 

Manual Items

Contents to include

Work Stoppage Criteria

Under what circumstances can the work be stopped?

Evacuation procedures

Evacuation routes, assembly points, and methods for verifying personnel

relief measures

First aid, calling 119, transport to hospital, emergency contact network

Preventing additional damage

Power cutoff, access control, danger zone marking, equipment shutdown

Reporting system

Reporting channels to site manager, safety and health officer, and management

Response by relevant agencies

Response procedures by the Ministry of Employment and Labor, police, fire department, etc.

Employee Support

Guide to Psychological Support for Accident Witnesses, Colleagues, and Managers

prevention of recurrence

Accident investigation, cause analysis, corrective measures, and training reflection

 

Simply writing a manual is not enough. You must check whether it is actually functioning at least once every six months and verify that field staff and managers understand the contents of the manual.

 


7. Systematically store supporting documents.

In responding to the Serious Accidents Punishment Act, evidentiary materials are not merely documents for archival purposes, but serve as grounds to explain whether the obligation to ensure safety and health has been fulfilled.

 

Supporting documents

Management purpose

Safety and Health Objectives and Management Policy

Confirmation of management decision-making and safety and health direction

Annual Safety and Health Plan

Management of training, inspections, budgets, and improvement tasks

Risk Assessment Table

Basis for Identification and Evaluation of Hazardous and Risk Factors

Record of corrective measures

Verification of implementation of risk factor elimination and improvement

Budget formulation and execution details

Securing safety and health budget and proof of actual execution

Safety and Health Meeting Minutes

Reporting to management, listening to employee opinions, and records of improvement discussions

Industrial Safety and Health Education Materials

Verification of Worker and Supervisor Training Implementation

Contract for work, service, or consignment

Verify whether subcontractor safety and health standards are reflected

Emergency Response Manual

Verify procedures for work stoppage, evacuation, relief, and prevention of further damage

Accident and Near Miss Records

Basis for recurrence prevention measures and improvement actions

 

Records should not be created all at once, but rather accumulated continuously throughout the daily work process. It is recommended to manage checklists, meeting minutes, photos, training materials, and records of completed improvements by workplace and department.

 


Practical Checklist

item

check

I checked if our company is subject to the Serious Accidents Punishment Act.

The number of regular employees, the scope of the workplace, and contracted, outsourced, and outsourced work have been summarized.

The management's safety and health objectives and management policies were documented.

A person in charge or organization was designated to oversee and manage safety and health affairs.

Hazardous and dangerous factors were identified for each workplace, and a risk assessment was conducted.

We set the person in charge and the deadline for corrective measures based on the risk assessment results.

We formulated the safety and health budget and managed the details of its actual execution.

The roles of the safety and health manager, supervisor, safety manager, and health manager were confirmed.

We operated meeting, suggestion, and reporting channels to listen to the opinions of employees.

Manuals for work suspension, evacuation, relief measures, and prevention of further damage have been prepared.

Standards for selecting contractors, service providers, and outsourced companies, as well as work management, were established.

We checked whether industrial safety and health training and supervisor training had been completed.

When accidents or near misses occurred, the cause analysis and measures to prevent recurrence were recorded.

Regular reports were submitted to management regarding major risk factors and the status of improvement measures.

Procedures for psychological support for victims, witnesses, and managers were established following the accident.



parts that are often missed

first, Cases where responding to the Serious Accidents Punishment Act is viewed merely as “preparing documents” It exists. The safety and health management system is not a document, but an actual implementation system. Risk factors must be identified, improvements made, the budget executed, personnel in charge must report, and behaviors in the field must change.

 

Second, Cases where the executive reporting system is operated only formally Major risk factors, accidents and near misses, budget requirements, and reasons for delays in improvements must be reported to management on a regular basis.

 

Third, Cases where a risk assessment was conducted but corrective measures were not followed It is available. The purpose of risk assessment is not merely to complete an evaluation form, but to reduce risk. You must manage everything from before-and-after photos of improvements and the completion date of measures to confirmation by the person in charge.

 

Fourth, Cases where contract, service, or entrusted work is missed Even if the work is performed by external personnel, if it falls within the scope of the company's actual control, operation, and management, safety and health standards and inspection records must be verified.

 

Fifth, Cases where psychological trauma and organizational anxiety are not managed after an accident There is. After a major accident or near miss, not only the victim but also witnesses, colleagues, and managers may experience anxiety, guilt, anger, and a burden of responsibility.

 

Sixth, Cases where the role of supervisor is handled solely through training Supervisors are the key implementers responsible for identifying risk factors before work begins, providing guidance on safety procedures, and reporting hazardous situations on-site. It is necessary to verify not only whether training has been completed but also whether the supervisor is actually performing their role.

 


Situations where EAP is needed

The key to responding to the Serious Accidents Punishment Act lies in accident prevention and the establishment of a safety and health management system. However, in organizations where actual serious accidents or near misses occur, psychological trauma among employees, internal anxiety, managerial burden, disputes over liability, and concerns about recurrence may arise alongside legal responses.

 

In the following situations, you may consider EAP or external counseling and organizational support systems together.

 

situation

Directions for EAP Utilization

Employees complain of shock and anxiety following a major accident or serious incident.

Crisis intervention, psychological emergency support

Accident witness exhibits insomnia, guilt, and avoidance reactions

Individual counseling, support for post-traumatic stress prevention

Field managers have difficulty communicating with employees and supporting their return after accidents.

Providing manager coaching and communication guides

Disputes over responsibility and conflicts within the organization intensified following the accident

Organizational recovery program, team-based counseling

Fatigue and dissatisfaction among field staff have increased following the strengthening of safety measures.

Change management consulting, organizational communication support

Issues regarding long-term treatment, industrial accidents, and return to work have arisen.

Psychological support before and after return, work adaptation support

Recurring tension and job stress among high-risk workers

Job stress counseling, recovery program

 

The Occupational Safety and Health Management System is an institutional mechanism for preventing accidents, while the Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is a complementary system that supports organizational recovery and alleviates psychological burdens before and after an accident. Particularly after a serious accident, it is necessary to address not only the support for the victim but also the burdens faced by witnesses, colleagues, managers, and HR personnel.

 


Related Posts

 


Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. Does the Serious Accidents Punishment Act apply to all companies?

You must verify the applicability of the Serious Accidents Punishment Act based on the number of regular employees and the situation of the workplace. Currently, provisions regarding serious industrial accidents do not apply to business owners and management executives of businesses or workplaces with fewer than five regular employees. However, for workplaces with five or more employees, it is advisable to review the industry type, actual working environment, and contracted, outsourced, or outsourced work together.

 

Q2. Is punishment mandatory if a serious accident occurs?

Punishment is not automatic simply because a serious accident has occurred. Factors such as whether the business owner or management violated their duty to ensure safety and health, and whether there is a causal link between that violation and the occurrence of the serious accident, are reviewed together. Therefore, it is important to establish a safety and health management system and keep records of its implementation on a regular basis.

 

Q3. What documents do I need to create for the safety and health management system?

Documents alone are insufficient. Safety and health objectives, management policies, risk assessments, corrective measures, budget execution, employee feedback, training, management of contracting, services, and outsourcing, and emergency response manuals must be actually implemented. Checklists, meeting minutes, photos of improvements, and training records must also be managed.

 

Q4. Is the response to the Serious Accidents Punishment Act complete once a risk assessment is conducted?

No. While risk assessment is an important starting point, it must be followed by corrective measures based on the results, budget allocation, designation of personnel, and monitoring of implementation. If the risk factors remain unchanged after merely completing the assessment form, it is difficult to consider it a substantive response.

 

Q5. What should HR personnel do in responding to the Serious Accidents Punishment Act?

HR personnel must manage safety and health training, supervisor training, new hire training, post-accident employee support, management of industrial accidents, leave of absence, and return to work, grievance response, and communication with managers. It is recommended to collaborate with the safety and health manager to organize training participants, completion records, and procedures for post-accident psychological support.

 


Next step

If you wish to go beyond simple checklist management in responding to the Serious Accidents Punishment Act and instead manage safety and health systems, managerial response, post-accident psychological support, and organizational recovery together, review the education, counseling, and organizational support systems tailored to your organization through a Nudge EAP implementation consultation.

 

👉 Go to Nudge EAP Implementation Consultation →

 

 


source

This content is intended for general informational purposes. Specific legal, labor, employment, occupational safety and health, medical, and psychological counseling matters may vary depending on workplace conditions and the latest laws, so review by relevant experts may be necessary.

 

Comments5
  • Unknown User3
    BEST
    중대재해 예방을 위해 HR 담당자가 안전보건 담당자와 우선적으로 함께 정리해야 할 항목은 무엇일까요?
  • Unknown User2
    위험성평가, 예산 집행, 도급·용역·위탁 관리까지 함께 점검해야 한다는 내용이 실무적으로 도움이 됐습니다. 부서 간 협업이 꼭 필요하겠네요.
  • Unknown User1
    중대재해처벌법 대응이 단순 서류 준비가 아니라 실제 안전보건관리체계 이행 여부를 설명할 수 있어야 한다는 점이 가장 중요해 보입니다.
  • Unknown User4
    사고 이후 피해자뿐 아니라 목격자, 동료, 관리자에 대한 심리 지원까지 고려해야 한다는 부분이 인상적이었습니다. EAP와 연결되는 지점이 분명하네요.