Guide to Risk Assessment Procedures and Establishment of Safety and Health Management System

Risk assessment is a core procedure for identifying hazardous factors in the workplace and implementing corrective measures, while the safety and health management system is a management structure for continuously operating this at the organizational level.

 


Key Summary

item

Items to check by the person in charge

Key Topic

Procedures for conducting risk assessments and establishing a safety and health management system

Main purpose

Prevention of industrial accidents, identification of hazardous and dangerous factors, implementation of corrective measures, prevention of serious accidents

Legal basis

Obligation to conduct risk assessments under the Occupational Safety and Health Act

Main targets

All workplaces, employers, safety and health managers, supervisors, and on-site workers

Risk assessment procedure

Preparation → Identification of hazardous factors → Risk determination → Establishment and implementation of reduction measures → Recording and sharing

Safety and Health Management System Elements

Executive leadership, worker participation, risk identification, elimination/replacement/control, contingency measures, contract management, evaluation/improvement

Practical Core

Checking the implementation of improvement measures that actually reduce risk, rather than filling out evaluation sheets

Supporting documents

Risk assessment sheet, corrective action records, site inspection checklist, meeting minutes, training materials, photos, budget execution details

EAP connection point

Post-accident psychological support, high-risk job stress management, managerial response, organizational recovery support

 

Risk assessment is the starting point of the safety and health management system. The system can be considered to function effectively only when hazardous factors at the site are identified, risk levels are determined, and measures are implemented to reduce them to an acceptable level.

 


What is Risk Assessment?

Risk assessment is a procedure in which an employer identifies hazardous and dangerous factors in the workplace, determines the likelihood and severity of such risks leading to worker injury or illness, and implements measures to reduce those risks.

 

Risk assessment is not merely an administrative procedure involving the preparation of documents. It is a preventive activity that identifies what accidents may occur in the actual work environment, which tasks are repeatedly dangerous, and which equipment, processes, and work methods need to be improved.

 

For example, in the manufacturing industry, pinching, cuts, electric shock, chemical exposure, noise, and musculoskeletal strain can be risk factors. In the construction industry, falls, falling objects, collapses, equipment collisions, suffocation, and fire can be major risk factors. Even in office-centered workplaces, long working hours, job stress, emotional labor, musculoskeletal strain, and emergency response issues can be subject to risk assessment.

 

division

explanation

Hazardous and dangerous factors

Causes that can cause accidents or diseases

Risk

Risk level considering the probability and severity of accidents

Risk assessment

The process of identifying hazardous and dangerous factors, assessing risks, and implementing corrective measures.

Reduction measures

Measures to eliminate or reduce risk

Safety and Health Management System

A management system that systematically operates risk assessments and corrective measures

 

The key to risk assessment is not stopping at "identifying the risk," but rather verifying "what was done to reduce the risk and whether those measures actually worked."

 


Who needs to check?

Risk assessment and the safety and health management system are not the sole responsibilities of the safety and health officer. They must be interconnected with management decision-making, on-site implementation by supervisors, worker participation, and HR's training and support management.

 

manager

Things to check

Business owner/management executive

Establishment of safety and health objectives, budget, personnel, approval of corrective measures, and management policy

Safety and Health Officer

Risk assessment operation, on-site inspection, management of corrective actions, record keeping

Supervisor

Identifying risk factors before work, worker training, and implementing on-site safety rules

HR Manager

Industrial safety and health training, supervisor training, new employee training, post-accident employee support

Management Support Manager

Protective equipment, facility improvements, external agency contracts, safety and health budget management

Site manager

Identification of risk factors by work process, implementation of corrective measures, and work stoppage and evacuation measures

worker

Reporting on-site hazards, sharing near-miss incidents, suggesting improvements, and adhering to safety regulations

Partner company representative

Identification of risk factors and implementation of safety measures for contracted, service, and outsourced work

 

Worker participation is particularly crucial in risk assessments, as workers actually performing the tasks are often the first to identify risk factors. Therefore, rather than simply designating a person responsible for filling out the assessment forms, a structure is needed that listens to feedback from the field and shares the results of improvements.

 


Procedures that the person in charge must check

1. Prepare in advance.

Before starting a risk assessment, you must first organize the scope, participants, methodology, schedule, and materials. Beginning the assessment without preparation may result in the omission of on-site risk factors or prevent the assessment results from leading to action.

 

Preparation items

Things to check

Evaluation scope

Classification by workplace, department, process, work, facility, and job unit

Participants

Safety and health officers, supervisors, on-site workers, and subcontractor representatives

Existing data

Accident history, near miss records, work standards, equipment list, chemical list

Evaluation method

Select a method suitable for the workplace, such as the checklist method, key factor description method, or frequency-intensity method.

schedule

Regular evaluation, ad-hoc evaluation, evaluation schedule for work changes

Record form

Risk assessment sheet, corrective action record sheet, meeting minutes, photo record form

 

In the preliminary preparation stage, it is important to specifically determine “which tasks will be evaluated.” Rather than simply listing department names, it is better to categorize them based on actual work units, equipment, movement routes, and the work environment.

 


2. Identify hazardous and risk factors.

Identifying hazardous and dangerous factors is a core step in risk assessment. You must inspect the site firsthand, listen to workers' opinions, and verify accident history and near-miss incidents.

 

Method of identification

Practical examples

On-site巡回 inspection

Check facilities, workflow, protective equipment, work posture, and electrical and chemical conditions

Worker Interview

Check anxious moments, recurring dangerous situations, and uncomfortable protective equipment during actual work

Near miss check

Records of near-injury situations, equipment malfunctions, slips, and pinch risks

Review of accident history

Check types of industrial accidents, work stoppage accidents, and recurring accidents over the past 3 years

Review of work standards

Verify that the actual work matches the documented procedures.

Verification of materials and equipment

Check MSDS, mechanical safety devices, emergency stop devices, and ventilation devices

Confirmation of subcontractor work

Identification of work scope and risk factors for contracted, service, and outsourced work

 

When identifying hazardous and dangerous factors, do not focus solely on "major accidents," but also pay attention to recurring discomfort and minor warning signs. Passages prone to frequent falls, uncomfortable working postures, reasons for not wearing protective equipment, verbal abuse from customers, exposure to extreme heat or cold, and fatigue from night work can all be significant risk factors.

 


3. Determines the risk

Once hazardous factors have been identified, the severity of the risk must be assessed. While methods for estimating risk may vary depending on the workplace, the likelihood of an accident and the severity of the consequences are generally considered together.

 

Judgment criteria

Confirmation question

Possibility of occurrence

How often can this risk occur?

importance

If it occurs, can it lead to death, serious injury, prolonged treatment, or occupational disease?

Exposure frequency

How often and for how long are workers exposed?

Existing measures

Are the current protective equipment, safety devices, and work procedures sufficient?

vulnerable

Are new hires, older workers, pregnant women, foreign workers, and subcontractor workers included?

Manageability

Is immediate improvement possible, and is a budget and schedule required?

 

In the risk assessment stage, it is more important to determine whether "this risk is acceptable at this time" than to assign an evaluation score. In particular, risks that could lead to death or serious injury must be managed as priority targets for improvement, even if they receive a low score.

 


4. Establish and implement risk reduction measures.

The purpose of risk assessment is to reduce risk. Therefore, reduction measures should be reviewed starting with the most fundamental methods possible.

 

priority

Examples of reduction measures

eliminate

Eliminate dangerous work itself or abolish unnecessary processes

Replacement

Change to safer equipment, materials, and work methods

Engineering measures

Installation of protective covers, safety railings, ventilation systems, automation, and emergency stop devices

Administrative measures

Changes in work procedures, work permit system, two-person teams, working hour restrictions, strengthened training

protective gear

Management of provision and wearing of safety helmets, safety glasses, dust masks, safety gloves, safety belts, etc.

 

In practice, reduction measures are often concluded solely with the provision of personal protective equipment (PPE). However, PPE should be viewed as a final supplementary measure; if possible, it is advisable to first consider methods to eliminate the risk itself or improve equipment, processes, and work methods.

 


5. Check whether corrective measures have been implemented.

If reduction measures have been established, you must verify whether they have actually been implemented. If you simply write "Improvement Scheduled" on the risk assessment sheet and stop there, it is difficult to consider the safety and health management system to be functioning.

 

Inspection items

Things to check

manager

Has a person responsible for corrective measures been designated?

Deadline

Has a scheduled completion date for the improvements been set?

budget

Have facility improvements, protective equipment, and training costs been reflected?

Execution proof

Do you have photos, purchase history, training records, and revised versions of work standards?

Verify the effect

Has the risk level decreased after the improvement?

Re-evaluation

Are there any remaining risks even after the improvements?

share

Have you notified workers and supervisors of the changes?

 

Once corrective measures are completed, it is recommended to keep on-site photos, training materials, records of changes to work standards, and checklists together. In particular, items with a high risk of serious accidents must be linked to reports to management and budget execution records.

 


6. Record and share with members.

The results of the risk assessment and corrective actions must be documented. These records serve not only for responding to inspections but also as foundational data for subsequent assessments, training, and accident prevention activities.

 

archival materials

Management purpose

Risk Assessment Implementation Plan

Verification of evaluation scope, schedule, and participants

List of hazardous and dangerous factors

Management of risk factors by task and process

Risk determination results

Basis for selecting priority improvement targets

Reduction measures

Identify risk elimination, replacement, and control measures

Record of implementation of corrective measures

Check person in charge, deadline, and completion status

On-site photos

Comparison before and after improvement

proceedings

Records of worker feedback and improvement discussions

Educational materials

Connecting evaluation results to on-site training

Re-evaluation records

Identify remaining risks after improvement

 

It is recommended to manage records so that supervisors and site managers can also access them, rather than having them kept solely by the safety and health officer. Actual on-site behavior can only change if the results of the risk assessment are reflected in training and work standards.

 


Standards for Establishing a Safety and Health Management System

If risk assessment is a procedure for identifying and improving risks in the field, the safety and health management system is a structure that ensures those activities are repeatedly executed within the organization.

 

The safety and health management system can be inspected based on the following elements.

 

element

Items to check by the person in charge

Executive Leadership

Safety and health goals, management policies, budget, and personnel allocation

Worker participation

Reporting risk factors, listening to opinions, Occupational Safety and Health Committee, sharing improvement results

Identify risk factors

Risk assessment, site inspection, near-miss analysis, accident history review

Elimination, replacement, and control of risk factors

Improvement measures, equipment upgrades, changes to work procedures, management of protective equipment

Emergency measures

Stop work, evacuation, relief measures, accident reporting, prevention of further damage

Management of contracts, services, and entrustment

Subcontractor selection criteria, pre-work consultation, joint inspection, and reflection of safety and health costs

Evaluation and Improvement

Regular inspections, reporting to management, re-evaluation of corrective measures, measures to prevent recurrence

 

The purpose of a safety and health management system is not merely to create separate file folders. Risk assessment, training, budgeting, site inspections, accident response, and subcontractor management must be connected as a single flow.

 


Practical Checklist

item

check

The scope of the risk assessment and the target tasks were determined.

Participation standards were established for safety and health officers, supervisors, and on-site workers.

I checked preliminary materials such as accident history, near misses, work standards, equipment lists, and MSDS.

Hazardous and dangerous factors were identified through on-site inspections and listening to workers' opinions.

We established criteria for determining risk and selected priority targets for improvement.

Risk reduction measures were reviewed in the order of removal, replacement, engineering measures, administrative measures, and protective equipment.

The person in charge, deadline, budget, and completion criteria for each improvement measure were determined.

We re-evaluated whether the risk level had decreased after the completion of improvement measures.

The results of the risk assessment were reflected in supervisor training and industrial safety and health education.

Emergency procedures, including work suspension, evacuation, relief measures, and accident reporting, have been established.

We verified the risk factors of contracted, outsourced, and subcontracted work, as well as the safety and health standards of partner companies.

Risk assessment sheets, records of corrective actions, meeting minutes, training materials, and photos were kept.

Regular reports were submitted to management regarding major risk factors and the status of improvement measures.

Procedures for psychological support for victims, witnesses, and managers were established together following the accident.

 


parts that are often missed

first, Cases where risk assessment is handled solely through paperwork Risk assessment is not merely about filling out an evaluation sheet, but is an activity that actually reduces risk. The assessment results must lead to corrective measures, budget allocation, training, and changes to work procedures.

 

Second, Cases where worker participation is operated only in a formality On-site workers are often the most aware of actual risk factors. Their opinions must be reflected through risk assessment meetings, suggestion systems, pre-work TBMs, and the sharing of near-miss incidents.

 

Third, Cases where the risk assessment is concluded without corrective measures Even if risk factors are identified, the preventive effect is low if there is no person in charge of the action, a deadline, a budget, or confirmation of completion.

 

Fourth, If you intend to manage all risks solely through the provision of protective equipment While protective equipment is important, measures to eliminate the risk itself or improve facilities and processes should be considered first.

 

Fifth, Cases where contract, service, or outsourced work is excluded from risk assessment Even if the work is performed by a subcontractor, if it takes place within our workplace or falls within the scope of the company's actual management, risk factors and safety measures must be verified before the work begins.

 

Sixth, Cases where psychological trauma and organizational anxiety are not managed after an accident There is. After a near miss or major accident, not only the victim but also witnesses, colleagues, and managers may experience anxiety and tension.

 


Situations where EAP is needed

Risk assessment and the occupational safety and health management system are fundamental frameworks for preventing accidents. However, in actual workplaces, situations requiring psychological and organizational support may arise simultaneously, such as tension from high-risk work, recurring near-misses, anxiety following an accident, managerial burden, disputes over responsibility, and support for returning to work.

 

In the following situations, you may consider EAP or external counseling and organizational support systems together.

 

situation

Directions for EAP Utilization

Employees are expressing anxiety due to repeated near misses.

Job stress counseling, risk awareness training

Witnesses and colleagues are shocked after a major accident or industrial accident

Crisis intervention, support for post-traumatic stress prevention

Site managers feel burdened between strengthening safety measures and employee resistance

Providing manager coaching and communication guides

Accumulation of tension and fatigue in high-risk workers

Recovery support, individual counseling, discussion on work environment adjustment

Disputes over liability or conflicts arise after the risk assessment

Organizational communication support, team recovery program

Workers returning from industrial accidents or leave of absence complain of difficulties adapting to work and anxiety about recurrence.

Psychological support before and after return, work adaptation counseling

Customer verbal abuse, emotional labor, and job stress were identified as risk factors.

Emotional Labor Counseling and Guide to Organizational Protection Systems

 

While risk assessment is a procedure to reduce physical and workplace risks, EAP is a complementary system that supports organizational recovery and alleviates psychological burdens before and after an accident. Particularly after an accident, it is necessary to address the burdens faced by victims, witnesses, colleagues, managers, and HR personnel.

 


Related Posts


Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. Is a risk assessment required at all workplaces?

Risk assessment is a procedure for employers to identify hazardous factors and evaluate risks within the workplace to take necessary measures. While the operational methods may vary depending on the size and industry of the workplace, it is a core management activity that must be reviewed by all businesses as a fundamental measure to prevent industrial accidents.

 

Q2. Is it sufficient to conduct a risk assessment only once a year?

While regular evaluations are necessary, re-evaluations must be conducted frequently whenever there are changes, such as modifications to work processes, the introduction of new equipment, accidents, repeated near-misses, or the identification of new hazardous factors. Risk assessment is not a one-time procedure but a process of iterative improvement.

 

Q3. Is it sufficient to just complete the risk assessment table?

No. The risk assessment sheet is merely a document for recording results. What is truly important are corrective measures to reduce risk factors, designation of personnel, budget allocation, verification of completion, and re-evaluation.

 

Q4. What is the relationship between the safety and health management system and risk assessment?

Risk assessment is a procedure for identifying and improving on-site risk factors, while the safety and health management system is a structure that ensures this procedure operates continuously within the organization. The results of the risk assessment must lead to reporting to management, budgeting, training, contract management, emergency measures, and evaluation and improvement.

 

Q5. What should the HR manager do in a risk assessment?

HR personnel must oversee occupational safety and health training, supervisor training, new hire training, post-accident employee support, management of leave, industrial accidents, and return-to-work, and grievance response. It is advisable to collaborate with the safety and health manager to organize training participants, completion records, and procedures for post-accident psychological support.

 


Next step

If you want to go beyond simple checklist management for risk assessment and safety and health management systems and connect them to accident prevention, managerial response, job stress management, and post-accident organizational recovery, review the training, counseling, and organizational support systems tailored to your organization through Nudge EAP implementation consultation.

 

👉 Go to Nudge EAP Implementation Consultation →

 


source

This content is intended for general informational purposes. Specific legal, labor, employment, occupational safety and health, medical, and psychological counseling matters may vary depending on workplace conditions and the latest laws, so review by relevant experts may be necessary.

 

Comments5
  • Unknown User2
    BEST
    위험성평가 결과를 산업안전보건교육과 관리감독자 교육에 반영하려면 어떤 방식으로 공유하는 것이 가장 효과적일까요?
  • Unknown User3
    근로자 참여가 중요하다는 부분에 공감했습니다. 실제 작업을 수행하는 직원들이 아차사고나 반복 위험요인을 가장 잘 알고 있을 것 같습니다.
  • Unknown User1
    위험성평가는 평가표 작성이 아니라 실제 위험을 줄이기 위한 개선조치까지 이어져야 한다는 점이 인상적이었습니다. 현장 실행 여부가 핵심이네요.
  • Unknown User4
    보호구 지급만으로 끝내지 않고 제거, 대체, 공학적 조치, 관리적 조치까지 우선순위로 검토해야 한다는 내용이 실무적으로 도움이 됐습니다.