From One-Day Support to Follow-up Counseling After the Death of a Colleague | An IT Company Emergency Psychological Support Case
From One-Day Support to Follow-up Counseling After the Death of a Colleague | An IT Company Emergency Psychological Support Case
One-day emergency support for 4 colleagues Follow-up non-face-to-face consultation The Connection Between Initial Support, Progress Summary, and Ongoing Counseling Examined in Records
Provided to 4 colleagues at an IT company 1-Day Emergency Psychological Support Based on that brief record of follow-up non-face-to-face consultations, we examine the flow of support that organizations should prepare for the post-crisis era. The concerns of the person in charge and the scenes of application have been adapted to aid understanding.
📌 The incident happens only once, but the time remaining for colleagues is not the same.
When news of a colleague's death reaches the person in charge, multiple tasks lie before them at once. They must decide who to notify first, how to adjust workloads, and how much support to provide for colleagues. What is more difficult than filling out a schedule is that not everyone reacts in the same way.
The case we will examine this time is following the death of a dispatched employee working together in the IT industry. 4 colleagues This is a record of psychological support provided. The original source records it as a suicide case. Here, the focus is on the method of supporting the bereaved colleague rather than the detailed circumstances of the incident. Even if the affiliation is different, the shock resulting from the experience of working together is a reason to consider providing support.
| Confirmed details | Facts recorded in the record |
|---|---|
| Industry and Support Background | IT Industry · Colleague Support Following Death of Dispatched Employee |
| Support scale | 4 colleagues |
| Progress | 1-Day Emergency Psychological Support · Brief Report |
| Subsequent connection | Non-face-to-face consultation |
| Discussion of follow-up projects | EAP Implementation Meeting Goals · Contract Success Status Unconfirmed |
To address the person in charge's initial concern, it is not a matter of gathering everyone in one place.
Reconstructing this scene from the perspective of the person in charge, the question is closer to "who should receive what guidance" than "who should be counseled today." It is difficult to view everyone's experience as the same simply because they are on the same team, or to conclude that support is unnecessary just because someone appears calm on the surface. While providing guidance on support... Allowing individuals to decide whether to participate and the scope of their speech You must leave room for room.
To the person in charge, scheduling may seem like the most urgent task. However, for the employees, understanding the nature of the event is what matters first. When attending a consultation, do they need to explain the case in detail? Will the information shared be conveyed to the company? Can they still utilize the service later even if they do not participate now? Guidance addressing these questions must be provided beforehand so that support does not become another burden. Gathering everyone in one place is different from allowing each individual to choose the help they need.
🛠️ This is how Nudge EAP was supported
There are three confirmed executions. First, 4 colleagues We provided one day of emergency psychological support to the subject. Second, we summarized the progress in a brief report. Third, we arranged support leading to non-face-to-face counseling. The key point of this case is that the one-day intervention and follow-up counseling were recorded together.
| Support flow | Verified execution | Operational points for other companies to refer to |
|---|---|---|
| First support | 1-Day Emergency Psychological Support · 4 people | Provide a brief and clear explanation of the purpose of support and how to use it. |
| Summary of progress | Brief report | Distinguish between content necessary for organizational operations and individual counseling content |
| Subsequent support | Follow-up non-face-to-face consultation | Route guidance for use even after the on-site schedule ends |
The perspective on time differs between those providing on-site support and the organizational manager. The manager may conclude that the support schedule is complete, but the employee's daily life continues into the next day. Therefore, in this case, it is necessary to focus on the counseling process that followed rather than the one-day duration. One day represents the operational period of the support, not the time required for the employee's recovery.
Start by organizing the channels for connecting on-site support with subsequent individual counseling, and what guidance the person in charge should provide. Inquiry regarding EAP support tailored to your organization You can review the scope of operation together at.
📋 What the person in charge needs is the next step, not the content of the consultation.
Imagine a scenario where the person in charge needs to explain the situation to their supervisor after providing support. Instead of simply summarizing what the employee said during the consultation, you should be able to explain how the support was provided and what preparations are needed going forward. Below is an example of reporting items organized for use by other organizations. It is not a direct reproduction of an actual report format.
| Things the person in charge will organize | Record example | Distinguish from individual counseling |
|---|---|---|
| Support Operations | Schedule · Application Method · Contact Person | Individual counseling remarks or counseling memos |
| Follow-up Information | How to Request a Consultation · How to Inquire About Scheduling | Sharing user lists without the consent of the parties involved |
| Organizational measures | Person in charge of reviewing breaks and work adjustments | Linking counseling usage to performance evaluations |
| Reconfirmation | Whether follow-up support guidance is missing | Arbitrarily grading employees' emotions |
In small-scale support, one can often guess who the recipient is even without names. However, the fact that the number of personnel is small does not mean it is acceptable to share detailed individual responses or consultation topics. It is advisable for the person in charge to narrow down the recipients and storage locations of reports, and to separate information provided to employees from that reviewed by managers.
🔎 A point where it is easy to finish after completing a single application
One aspect of crisis support that is easily overlooked is what happens after the initial session ends. Someone who did not participate on the day may need help a few days later, or it may be difficult to meet again because their work location has changed. Therefore, it is important to leave a channel for follow-up counseling so that employees can find it themselves when needed. In this case as well Follow-up non-face-to-face consultation This is recorded.
Follow-up instructions do not need to be long. You simply need to gather where to request a consultation, how to inquire about scheduling, and things to check when using the service in one place. It is best if the format allows even employees who missed the initial guidance to find it again. The lesson the person in charge should take from this case is not that “one day of support is sufficient,” but, The operating principle of not cutting off avenues for assistance even after the initial support has ended. no see.
✅ Four things to decide before an incident occurs if applied to our organization
① Designate a designated point of contact to collect emergency support requests. ② Verify the scope of support for colleagues with different employment types or affiliations in advance. ③ Prepare a counseling channel to be used after on-site support is completed. ④ Defines the boundary between operational information required by the organization and personal counseling information. The specific response must be adjusted in accordance with the situation, the intentions of the parties involved, and professional judgment.
Help does not need to be received in the same way for everyone. It is about not demanding the same response from everyone and enabling the ability to choose support when desired. If this example is applied to the operations of the next organization, this is the first standard that must be established.
Recommended Posts
Case Studies of On-site Consultation Operations by Public Enterprises at Nationwide Workplaces
Guide to Using the Operation Cases Board
Based on actual support records from the IT industry, this document has been reconstructed by excluding company names, dates, and personally identifiable information. It distinguishes between the verified scope of support and the explanations and operational examples designed to aid reader application. If you are in immediate danger, do not wait to schedule a consultation; please contact 112 or 119. The suicide prevention hotline 109 is available 24 hours a day.
Most Engaging Posts in the Community
- 0160026.10.22
- 0260026.10.22
- 03CommentsWe also have a lot of short-term contract workers during peak season, so I get confused every time I have to handle the training for rehired employees. I'm also curious how other places handle cases where contracts are renewed immediately without any gaps.132226.10.21
- 01coach AnswerHello, this is Nudge EAP ☺️ You should group tasks based on whether the actual work type and conditions are the same, rather than the process name. Tasks can be considered the same if the worker posture, number of repetitions and time, handling weight and frequency, movement, and equipment and tools are similar. Therefore, even within the same assembly process, it is better to separate "seated assembly" and "standing assembly while moving materials" into separate tasks. First, list the detailed tasks within the process and compare them using the criteria above; separating only the tasks with significant differences makes organization easier, even with a large workforce. If there are multiple tasks under the same conditions, you can select a representative sample that includes the worker with the highest workload. The KOSHA guide suggests using at least two tasks with high work intensity as a sample when there are 10 or fewer identical tasks. Shifts can be grouped together if the equipment, workload, speed, and personnel are the same, but if the conditions differ, please separate them by shift. For rotation workers, you can make a judgment by recording all detailed tasks performed during the day, along with the time and frequency of each. For the final classification, confirm the opinions of on-site workers, and if you record the basis for the grouping on the survey form, it will be easier to explain during inspections.753326.09.18
- 02CommentsThe distinction between receiving a report and reaching a conclusion is important. Global HR teams should secure immediate protection and confidentiality before trying to decide whether the conduct legally qualifies as harassment.734426.09.02
- 03coach AnswerHello, this is Nudge EAP.☺️ The simplest method is for employees to simply receive guidance and apply directly, as the company does not transfer personal information. If you want a health manager to forward a name and contact information to an EAP agency for contact, it is safer to explain the receiving agency, purpose, items, retention period, and the right to refuse consent, and to obtain clear consent from the individual. Since checkup results and symptoms are sensitive health information, do not consider them included in the existing health checkup consent; instead, please write down only the content to be conveyed and obtain separate consent. In practice, it is common to separate the options into ① consent for forwarding name and contact information and ② consent for forwarding checkup results and symptoms, ensuring that there is no disadvantage in using the EAP even if the second option is not agreed to. The burden of repeating explanations can be reduced by providing the option for employees to send a summary of their consultation request, written directly by the employee, to the agency. However, since the wording and procedures may vary depending on whether the contract with the EAP agency involves the outsourcing of personal information processing or the provision of information to a third party, please review the contract details with your in-house personal information manager before implementation. It is a good idea to define the scope of responses in advance to the company to prevent unnecessary feedback regarding consultation requests or their content.698926.09.21
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10