MSDS Update Responsibility Allocation Table | Roles of Health Manager, Purchasing Department, and User Department Excel
MSDS Update Responsibility Allocation Table | Roles of Health Manager, Purchasing Department, and User Department Excel
Even if a supplier sends the updated MSDS, if it is not designated internally who receives, replaces, and provides training, the old MSDS remains in the field. From securing the MSDS to reflecting the changes R·A·C·I Role Table for 20 Tasks and automatically displays the status of each product MSDS Management Log I created it into a single file.
📎 Attachments to this post
Determining roles for each department Responsibility Sharing Table , viewing MSDS status by product MSDS Management Register , recording the changed MSDS processing process Change history , leaving a record of requests made to the supplier Supplier request records , summarized the legal basis Standards and Basis , containing the order of use Writing Guide It consists of sheets.
📌 When is the best time to use this?
- When the MSDS on the site bulletin board is dated several years ago and it is unclear who should verify if it is the latest version
- When repurchasing, if the new MSDS enclosed by the supplier gets stuck at the purchasing team or warehouse and does not reach the site
- When MSDS training was conducted but there is no record of whether it was re-trained after the ingredients changed
- When the health manager is solely responsible for MSDS management and wants to share the work with the purchasing and user departments
What to check before introducing new materials Safety and Health Review Process Before Purchasing Chemicals Pillar I have organized this. This article focuses on the division of roles for keeping the MSDS up to date after it has been received.
🔄 How does the MSDS change before it reaches our company?
Manufacturers and importers must submit an updated MSDS to the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency without delay if there are changes to the product name, the names and contents of constituent ingredients, health and environmental hazards, or physical risks (Article 110(3) of the Act; Article 159 of the Enforcement Rule). Furthermore, they must provide the updated MSDS to the place where the substance has already been received, and intermediate distributors and sellers must also forward the received updated MSDS (Articles 111(2)(3) of the Act). In cases where the same substance is continuously supplied without changes, additional provision may be omitted, however, Provided again upon request by the user Must do so (Article 160, Paragraph 2 of the Enforcement Rules).
In other words, updated MSDS are received through the supplier, but the user business owner is responsible for replacement and training after they are received. The purpose of the responsibility sharing table is to ensure that documentation does not stall during this process.
| Changed items | Workplace tasks to be done | reason |
|---|---|---|
| Product Name | Replacement of posted/available MSDS, modification of product names in management logs and warning labels | Article 114(1) and Article 115(2) of the Act |
| Name of component and content | Replacement of MSDS, reconfirmation of regulatory applicability (including changes in measurement and special inspection targets), reflection of risk assessment | Article 159 of the Enforcement Rules, Article 15(2) of the Risk Assessment Guidelines |
| Hazards and risks | Replacement of MSDS and management guidelines, retraining and record-keeping of handling workers, and reflection of risk assessment | Article 169(1)(3) of the Enforcement Rules |
👥 Preview of Responsibility Allocation Table
R stands for execution, A for final responsibility (one department per task), C for consultation, and I for sharing. The following are some of the default values from the attached file; please modify them to fit your organization, as they are examples based on a typical manufacturing workplace.
| work | purchase | User Department | Health | safety | reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Request MSDS and warning labels from the supplier before placing an order | A | R | I | - | Article 111(1) of the Act |
| Posting and availability of MSDS | - | R | A | I | Article 114(1) of the Act |
| Posting management guidelines | - | R | A | C | Article 114(2) of the Act |
| MSDS Training and Records | - | R | A | C | Article 169 of the Enforcement Rules |
| Receipt of updated MSDS | A | R | I | - | Article 111, Paragraphs 2 through 3 of the Act |
| Revision of Posted MSDS Replacement and Management Guidelines | - | R | A | I | Article 114 (①②) of the Act |
| Reflection of risk assessment | - | R | C | A | Article 15, Paragraph 2 of the Risk Assessment Guidelines |
| Regularly check with the supplier for the latest MSDS | A | I | R | - | Article 160, Paragraph 2 of the Enforcement Rules |
The key point is Designate the purchasing department as the 'entrance for MSDS'. This is how it is done. If it is established that the purchasing department receives the new MSDS enclosed during repurchase or the supplier's email and forwards it to the health manager, the occurrence of outdated on-site postings can be significantly reduced.
🗂️ Material Composition
| sheet | use | Input / Automatic |
|---|---|---|
| Writing Guide | Distinction between usage order, status indication rules, statutory obligations, and practice recommendations | For reading |
| Responsibility Sharing Table | R·A·C·I of 20 tasks at the pre-purchase, pre-stocking, in use, change, and suspension stages | Role Selection + A Automatic Duplicate/Omission Check |
| MSDS Management Register | Product name, supplier, place of use, submission number, revision date, posting location, warning sign, training date, supplier verification date | Input + Next Confirmation Date/Status Automatic |
| Change history | Date of change receipt, changed item, date of replacement/management guideline modification/training/risk assessment reflection | Input + Completed · In Progress · Overdue Automatic |
| Supplier request records | MSDS request date, method, response result, re-request date | Input + Re-request Required Automatic |
| Standards and Basis | Summary of MSDS provisions, reference to penalties, official link | For reading |
✍️ Order of Use
- Responsibility Sharing Table Finalized — Refer to the default values and modify R·A·C·I to fit your company's organization. If there is not a single A for a task, '1 A assigned' is displayed. Share the finalized table with the purchasing and user departments.
- Management Register Registration List each product used at the workplace on a separate line, and include the MSDS receipt date, posting location, warning label, and training date. Organize starting with products whose status is 'MSDS not available', 'Posting/Display verified', or 'Training verified'.
- Regular checks — When the verification cycle (default 12 months) approaches, 'Verification Imminent' is displayed. Ask the supplier for the latest MSDS and record it in the [Supplier Request Record].
- Change processing — When you receive the updated MSDS, add a line to [Change History] and fill in the dates for posting replacement, management guideline modification, training, and risk assessment reflection. Also, change the receipt date and revision date in the management ledger to the new values.
- Annual review — If the organization or the person in charge changes, re-check the responsibility allocation table.
🧮 Automatic display method
| sheet | mark | standard |
|---|---|---|
| MSDS Management Register | MSDS not secured → Verification of posting/display → Verification of training → Verification delayed → Verification imminent → Normal | Decisions are made in the following order: no receipt date, no posting location or warning sign N, no training date or training date prior to receipt date, past next scheduled verification date, and within 30 days. |
| Change history | Completed / In Progress / Overdue | Completion of revisions to posting replacement and management guidelines (changes to ingredients/hazards must be reflected in education/risk assessment) and processing period (default 14 days, practical example) |
| Supplier request records | Closed / Awaiting Reply / Request Required | If there is a response, the case is closed; if there is no response and 14 days have passed since the request, a re-request is required. |
| Responsibility Sharing Table | Normal / 1 A required / R required | Is there exactly one A for each task and is there an execution manager? |
✅ Things to check before application
Please decide on the following before writing the file. Especially Changed MSDS reception window, posting method, and training record storage location If they are not determined, the same problem will recur even if you fill out the management ledger. If three or more have not been determined, it is recommended to schedule a brief meeting with the purchasing and user departments first.
| Inspection items | Confirmation details | check |
|---|---|---|
| reception counter | We designated the department and person in charge to receive the supplier's email and enclosed MSDS. | □ |
| Posting method | We determined the method for each process, ranging from paper postings to computerized storage. | □ |
| Education records | We determined the location to store the MSDS training records (time, content, and attendees). | □ |
| Confirmation cycle | We set a company standard for the frequency of asking suppliers about the latest status. | □ |
| Processing period | We set an internal deadline for replacement and training after receiving the revised MSDS. | □ |
| Linkage with risk assessment | A pathway has been established to refer changes in ingredients or hazards to an ad-hoc risk assessment. | □ |
🔐 Precautions when using
- The 12-month verification cycle and 14-day processing period are practical example values. Since there are no separate regulations specifying regular re-verification cycles or internal processing deadlines, please determine them based on your company's standards.
- The 'Normal' designation is merely an internal inspection result based on the date of entry and is not a legal judgment. Please verify the actual posting status and MSDS version on-site.
- If you requested an MSDS from a supplier but did not receive it, there are separate penalty standards, so please be sure to record the date and method of the request in the [Supplier Request Record].
- If the list of training attendees is included, please limit the sharing scope to relevant personnel.
❓ FAQ
Q1. How often do I need to obtain a new MSDS?
There is no legally mandated periodic update cycle for user workplaces. When changes occur, the supplier must provide an updated MSDS, and must provide it again upon request from the user. Therefore, we recommend establishing a verification cycle based on the company's standards, inquiring with the supplier about the status of the latest version, and keeping a record of these interactions.
Q2. Is it mandatory to undergo training again if I receive an updated MSDS?
Training must be provided when hazard and risk information changes (Article 169 of the Enforcement Rule). If the hazard information remains the same, such as when only the product name has changed, replacing the MSDS and updating the ledger may be sufficient, so please check the details of the changes first.
Q3. Is it correct for the purchasing department to take on A (final responsibility)?
Legal obligations lie with the employer, while the division of responsibilities among departments is determined by the company. The default attachment setting is an example where the Purchasing Department handles request and reception tasks—which serve as the 'entry point for MSDS'—while the Health Manager takes charge of A for tasks requiring health judgment, such as posting and training. You may adjust this to fit the size of your organization, but ensure there is only one place for A for each task.
Recommended Posts
👉 Next step
Tasks involving multiple departments, such as chemical management, can easily place a heavy burden on the person in charge. Try establishing a consultation channel that both the person in charge and field staff can use comfortably.
Inquire about EAP Implementation →📚 Source and Verification Criteria
- National Law Information Center · Articles 110–115 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (Material Safety Data Sheets and Warning Labels)
- National Law Information Center · Articles 117 and 118 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, Articles 87 and 88 of the Enforcement Decree (Substances Prohibited from Manufacture, etc., or Subject to Permission)
- National Law Information Center · Articles 157–170 of the Enforcement Rules of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (Submission, Provision, Posting, Management Guidelines, Education, Warning Labeling of MSDS)
- National Law Information Center · Articles 420 and 422 of the Rules on Occupational Safety and Health Standards, Annex 12 (Hazardous Substances Subject to Management)
- National Law Information Center · Article 186 of the Enforcement Rule of the Occupational Safety and Health Act · Annex 21 (Subjects of Workplace Environment Measurement), Annex 22 (Hazardous Substances Subject to Special Health Examinations)
- National Law Information Center · Articles 10, 12, and 15 of the Guidelines on Workplace Risk Assessment (Notification of the Ministry of Employment and Labor)
- National Law Information Center · Annex 35 of the Enforcement Decree of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (Criteria for Imposing Administrative Fines)
- National Law Information Center · Articles 2, 13, 24, and 28 of the Chemical Substances Control Act
- Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency · Material Safety Data Sheet System (KMS)
- Ministry of Climate, Energy and Environment · Chemical Information System (ICIS)
This document is a practical reference form for dividing and inspecting MSDS updates at workplaces using chemical substances. The default values for responsibility sharing, verification cycles, and processing deadlines are practical examples rather than legal standards; automatic displays represent internal inspection results based on input values and do not substitute for legal judgments. For matters requiring workplace-specific judgment, please consult the competent Regional Employment and Labor Office or the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency. Date of verification for laws and official data: October 14, 2026.
Most Engaging Posts in the Community
- 0160026.10.22
- 0250026.10.22
- 03CommentsWe also have a lot of short-term contract workers during peak season, so I get confused every time I have to handle the training for rehired employees. I'm also curious how other places handle cases where contracts are renewed immediately without any gaps.132226.10.21
- 01coach AnswerHello, this is Nudge EAP ☺️ You should group tasks based on whether the actual work type and conditions are the same, rather than the process name. Tasks can be considered the same if the worker posture, number of repetitions and time, handling weight and frequency, movement, and equipment and tools are similar. Therefore, even within the same assembly process, it is better to separate "seated assembly" and "standing assembly while moving materials" into separate tasks. First, list the detailed tasks within the process and compare them using the criteria above; separating only the tasks with significant differences makes organization easier, even with a large workforce. If there are multiple tasks under the same conditions, you can select a representative sample that includes the worker with the highest workload. The KOSHA guide suggests using at least two tasks with high work intensity as a sample when there are 10 or fewer identical tasks. Shifts can be grouped together if the equipment, workload, speed, and personnel are the same, but if the conditions differ, please separate them by shift. For rotation workers, you can make a judgment by recording all detailed tasks performed during the day, along with the time and frequency of each. For the final classification, confirm the opinions of on-site workers, and if you record the basis for the grouping on the survey form, it will be easier to explain during inspections.753326.09.18
- 02CommentsThe distinction between receiving a report and reaching a conclusion is important. Global HR teams should secure immediate protection and confidentiality before trying to decide whether the conduct legally qualifies as harassment.724426.09.02
- 03coach AnswerHello, this is Nudge EAP.☺️ The simplest method is for employees to simply receive guidance and apply directly, as the company does not transfer personal information. If you want a health manager to forward a name and contact information to an EAP agency for contact, it is safer to explain the receiving agency, purpose, items, retention period, and the right to refuse consent, and to obtain clear consent from the individual. Since checkup results and symptoms are sensitive health information, do not consider them included in the existing health checkup consent; instead, please write down only the content to be conveyed and obtain separate consent. In practice, it is common to separate the options into ① consent for forwarding name and contact information and ② consent for forwarding checkup results and symptoms, ensuring that there is no disadvantage in using the EAP even if the second option is not agreed to. The burden of repeating explanations can be reduced by providing the option for employees to send a summary of their consultation request, written directly by the employee, to the agency. However, since the wording and procedures may vary depending on whether the contract with the EAP agency involves the outsourcing of personal information processing or the provision of information to a third party, please review the contract details with your in-house personal information manager before implementation. It is a good idea to define the scope of responses in advance to the company to prevent unnecessary feedback regarding consultation requests or their content.668926.09.21
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10