I tried a walking challenge at two general hospitals | What was harder than 100,000 steps was the ‘certification’
I tried a walking challenge at two general hospitals | What was harder than 100,000 steps was the 'certification'
Design of walking challenge target step count, duration, verification method, and reward budget, along with disclosure of 14-day participation and achievement rates
Two general hospitals with approximately 1,000 employees 14-day walking challenge under the same conditions I operated it. I have organized the target step count, number of verifications, how the reward budget was set, how many people actually achieved it, and even the parts that did not go well.
of the participants 51~63% achieved 100,000 steps However, only 45% of people completed up to 5 verification photos. The percentage of those who met both conditions was 42–44%, and the number of steps dropped significantly during the holiday period. If operating for the first time The goal is 'daily limit × number of days achieved,' and certification is based on a standard lower than walking. I recommend catching it.
🙋 This would be good for organizations like this to refer to.
This article is a practical record for HR, Welfare, and Health managers who are planning an in-house walking challenge for the first time or looking to readjust standards for the next round based on the results of the previous one. In particular, in the following situations, you can use the design values and result data directly as comparison standards.
- Cases where the participation method must be simplified due to a mix of shift and field workers with around 1,000 employees.
- Cases where you start by thinking of high standards like “10,000 steps × 30 days” because you have no basis for setting a target number of steps and verifications
- When you need to propose a compensation budget but are at a loss as to how many people to target
- If schedule adjustments are necessary because public holidays or long weekends fall within the challenge period
📋 Design Values at a Glance | Steps · Weeks · Times · How Much
| What the person in charge asks | Setting of this case | Actual result |
|---|---|---|
| What is the target number of steps? | Up to 10,000 steps recognized per day, accumulated over 14 days 100,000 steps (10 days or more, 10,000 steps) | Achieved 63% / 51% of participants |
| How long is the period? | 14th (Including 2 weekends and the Children's Day holiday) | The number of people achieving 10,000 steps during the holiday period dropped by about half. |
| How many times is the certification? | Walking photo post in app community 5 times or more | 64~67% for 1 or more times, 45% for 5 times |
| What is the compensation budget? | 82 people who achieved both conditions About 400,000 won (Coffee coupon-based, average of about 4,900 won per person) | 73 people who met both conditions / 73 people |
| What is the participation rate? | Target audience: Approximately 1,000 people, voluntary participation after prior notice | 168 people (16.8%) / 173 people (15.3%) |
📊 Walking Challenge Results | Participation and Achievement Rate Data
| Metrics (based on participants) | Hospital A | Hospital B |
|---|---|---|
| Achieved 100,000 steps | 106 people (63.1%) | 88 people (50.9%) |
| Proof photo 1 or more / 5 or more | 107 people (63.7%) / 76 people (45.2%) | 115 people (66.5%) / 78 people (45.1%) |
| Both conditions achieved | 73 people (43.5%) | 73 people (42.2%) |
| Average cumulative recognized steps per person | 98,582 steps | 93,365 steps |
| Days of achieving an average of 10,000 steps per person | July 2nd | June 5th |
⚠️ 2 things that didn't go well
1) Certification was the barrier to entry, rather than the walking itself.
While the app automatically counts steps, taking and uploading a verification photo requires action. Although 64–67% of respondents uploaded at least once, only 45% met the requirement of five uploads. Consequently, The final achievement rate was determined by the number of verifications, not the number of steps. It was.
2) The number of steps dropped during the holidays.
On weekdays, the average per person was generally 7,000 to 8,200 steps, but on Sunday (Day 12) during the holiday period, it dropped to 4,400 to 5,200 steps, and the number of people reaching 10,000 steps also decreased to half the weekday level (55 and 44 people). If the holiday period falls within the duration... Excluding holidays or holiday-exclusive missions It is better to keep it separate.
How many steps would be appropriate for our company?
If you let us know the size of your workforce, work patterns, and operating period, we will design the expected participation rate, target step count, and certification criteria together.
Inquire about introducing a walking challenge →🛠️ This is how Nudge EAP was designed and operated
Nudge EAP does not end the challenge as a simple event, Participation rate, achievement rate, and daily participation flow are saved as design data for the next round.
- Comparison with the same design We applied the same goals, certifications, and compensation conditions to the two hospitals to directly compare the differences between the institutions (63% vs. 51% for achieving 100,000 steps).
- Data aggregation by date We combined app step count integration with community verification to aggregate step counts and verification counts by participant and date, and determined the reward recipients by identifying those who met both conditions.
- Connect to the next level The two hospitals subsequently extended the period to about one month and ran a challenge combining a cumulative 200,000 steps and four plogging certifications in consecutive rounds.
✅ Checklist Before Starting a Walking Challenge
The checklist below is for internal inspection by HR personnel to verify whether there are any design omissions before announcing the walking challenge.
especially Target step count, certification criteria, period, reward budget These are basic verification items. If even one of these items is not organized, it is better to refine the design first rather than creating a guide banner.
Among all items If 3 or more are insufficient It is recommended to review the target audience, schedule, aggregation method, and compensation processing procedures, rather than just refining the promotional text.
| division | Confirmation items | check |
|---|---|---|
| Target number of steps | A daily recognition limit and the number of days to achieve were set, and the cumulative goal was calculated as “limit × number of days.” | ☐ |
| Certification standards | We set the number of verifications lower than the walking goal and included examples of face-free verification in the instructions. | ☐ |
| period | I checked whether public holidays, long weekends, or vacation seasons were included, and if they were, I decided to exclude them or set a holiday mission. | ☐ |
| Compensation budget | The compensation quantity and budget were calculated based on the achievement rate of the two conditions (42–44% in this case). | ☐ |
| Target range | The target participants, including regular employees, contract workers, and partner companies, were determined, and the number of eligible individuals was recorded. | ☐ |
| App integration | We provided instructions on how to link the step count and confirmed linkage errors through a test one week before the start. | ☐ |
| Encouragement schedule | We set the schedule for encouragement messages for the first three days, the middle, before and after the holidays, and the last week. | ☐ |
| Result Report | It was decided to report only participation rates, achievement rates by condition, and daily flow, and to use individual records solely for compensation processing. | ☐ |
🗓️ Operation Schedule | From 3 weeks before start to 1 week after end
| Point of view | Things to do | Things to check |
|---|---|---|
| D-21 | Finalize purpose, target, period, and budget | Approval regarding inclusion of holidays, number of eligible personnel, and compensation budget |
| D-14 | Target step count, verification, and reward criteria finalized; information banner created | Certification example phrases, inquiry channels |
| D-7 | App Installation & Step Count Synchronization Guide, Test Challenge | Integration Error, Sign-up Inquiry |
| In progress | Encouragement during the first 3 days, middle period, before and after holidays, and the last week | Changes in the number of participants and those who achieved 10,000 steps by day |
| D+7 | Achiever count, reward distribution, results summary | Number of people meeting both conditions, baseline for the next round |
⚠️ Common mistakes
| mistake | Problems that arise | Try changing it like this |
|---|---|---|
| Set only the cumulative step count as the goal. | Achieving it by walking all at once in a single day weakens the effect of habit formation. | We consider the number of days achieved together with a daily recognition limit. |
| Set the number of certifications as high as your walking goal. | The number of people who walk but fail the certification is increasing. | Certification is set at a lower standard than walking. |
| I do not take holidays into account in the schedule. | The number of people reaching the holiday section drops to half the level of weekdays. | Remove holidays or set holiday-exclusive missions. |
| The compensation quantity is set based on the number of applicants. | The budget is either over-allocated or, conversely, insufficient. | Calculate the quantity based on the expected achievement rate for each condition. |
| Reveal individual rankings and lists | It places a burden on employees who have difficulty walking and makes them reluctant to participate. | We only share organizational unit aggregations. |
💬 When EAP support is needed
A walking challenge is a program designed to build healthy habits. However, it is difficult to resolve difficulties such as job stress, sleep problems, and burnout solely through the challenge. If comments like “Walking is a struggle these days” or “I can barely sleep” are raised during the process, it is better to offer counseling guidance first rather than encouraging the challenge.
Recommended Posts
❓ FAQ
Q1. What is a suitable target number of steps for a walking challenge?
In this case, where the daily limit was set at 10,000 steps and the goal was to achieve it in 10 days (100,000 cumulative steps), more than half of the participants achieved it. If you have many field or shift workers, or if you are running this for the first time, try lowering the limit or dividing the courses by difficulty level.
Q2. How is the verification method for the walking challenge determined?
You can operate it using only automatic step count synchronization. If you add photo verification, set the frequency lower than the walking goal and include a verification example in the instructions that does not require the face to be visible.
Q3. Is a participation rate of 15–17% on the low side?
Simple comparisons are difficult as they vary depending on the target audience, app installation status, work patterns, and promotion period. In practice, for the first round, it is more useful to establish the achievement rate and daily trends as a baseline for comparison with subsequent rounds, rather than focusing on the participation rate.
Q4. What compensation should I prepare, and how much?
In this case, participants who met both conditions were primarily rewarded with coffee coupons, costing approximately 400,000 won for 82 people (an average of about 4,900 won per person). The quantity of rewards is calculated based on the expected achievement rate for each condition rather than the number of applicants, and methods like this one, which provide small rewards to all achievers, make it easy to calculate the budget in advance.
Q5. Is it okay to share individual step count records with the department head?
We do not recommend this. Since step counts provide information that suggests health status or lifestyle patterns, it is generally best to manage them within a scope that does not allow for individual identification. Report results as organizational-level aggregations, such as participation rates, achievement rates by condition, and daily flow, and use individual records solely for compensation processing.
👉 Design your next walking challenge with data
Nudge EAP manages everything from designing target step counts, certifications, and rewards to aggregating daily results and suggesting improvements for the next round.
View Nudge EAP Walking Challenge → Inquiry about Challenge Implementation →📚 Source and Information
- WHO, Physical activity (fact sheet): https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity
- WHO, Guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behavior: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015128
- Korea Labor Welfare Network, Introduction to the Employee Assistance Program (EAP): https://welfare.comwel.or.kr/default/page.do?mCode=D010010010
This content is written for general informational purposes and is based on aggregated data from walking challenges operated by Nudge EAP. Results may vary depending on organizational size, work patterns, and the timing of operation.
Most Engaging Posts in the Community
- 0160026.10.22
- 0260026.10.22
- 03CommentsWe also have a lot of short-term contract workers during peak season, so I get confused every time I have to handle the training for rehired employees. I'm also curious how other places handle cases where contracts are renewed immediately without any gaps.132226.10.21
- 01coach AnswerHello, this is Nudge EAP ☺️ You should group tasks based on whether the actual work type and conditions are the same, rather than the process name. Tasks can be considered the same if the worker posture, number of repetitions and time, handling weight and frequency, movement, and equipment and tools are similar. Therefore, even within the same assembly process, it is better to separate "seated assembly" and "standing assembly while moving materials" into separate tasks. First, list the detailed tasks within the process and compare them using the criteria above; separating only the tasks with significant differences makes organization easier, even with a large workforce. If there are multiple tasks under the same conditions, you can select a representative sample that includes the worker with the highest workload. The KOSHA guide suggests using at least two tasks with high work intensity as a sample when there are 10 or fewer identical tasks. Shifts can be grouped together if the equipment, workload, speed, and personnel are the same, but if the conditions differ, please separate them by shift. For rotation workers, you can make a judgment by recording all detailed tasks performed during the day, along with the time and frequency of each. For the final classification, confirm the opinions of on-site workers, and if you record the basis for the grouping on the survey form, it will be easier to explain during inspections.753326.09.18
- 02CommentsThe distinction between receiving a report and reaching a conclusion is important. Global HR teams should secure immediate protection and confidentiality before trying to decide whether the conduct legally qualifies as harassment.734426.09.02
- 03coach AnswerHello, this is Nudge EAP.☺️ The simplest method is for employees to simply receive guidance and apply directly, as the company does not transfer personal information. If you want a health manager to forward a name and contact information to an EAP agency for contact, it is safer to explain the receiving agency, purpose, items, retention period, and the right to refuse consent, and to obtain clear consent from the individual. Since checkup results and symptoms are sensitive health information, do not consider them included in the existing health checkup consent; instead, please write down only the content to be conveyed and obtain separate consent. In practice, it is common to separate the options into ① consent for forwarding name and contact information and ② consent for forwarding checkup results and symptoms, ensuring that there is no disadvantage in using the EAP even if the second option is not agreed to. The burden of repeating explanations can be reduced by providing the option for employees to send a summary of their consultation request, written directly by the employee, to the agency. However, since the wording and procedures may vary depending on whether the contract with the EAP agency involves the outsourcing of personal information processing or the provision of information to a third party, please review the contract details with your in-house personal information manager before implementation. It is a good idea to define the scope of responses in advance to the company to prevent unnecessary feedback regarding consultation requests or their content.698926.09.21
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10