Managerial Reporting and Coordination Procedures When an Employee Expresses Crisis
2026.08.06 11:25
Suicide Prevention, Mental Health, Manager Reporting, and Referral Guide
Managerial Reporting and Coordination Procedures When an Employee Expresses Crisis
When an employee expresses a crisis, the procedure for reporting to and coordinating with managers is not a โmethod of providing good counseling,โ but, A procedure to connect you with necessary help without missing any risks. Managers should not attempt to diagnose or persuade employees, but rather verify the current safety status, report to HR and crisis response personnel to the extent necessary, and then, depending on the situation, connect to external channels such as 109, 119, or 112.
The most important point in this article
A manager is not someone who solves problems
I am a person who creates safety checks and connection flows.
I am a person who creates safety checks and connection flows.
Crisis Expression Verification โ Safety Verification โ Reporting โ External Collaboration โ Documentation โ Post-verification
short answer
If an employee makes remarks implying suicide or self-harm, such as โI want to die,โ โI want to disappear,โ โI canโt bear it anymore,โ or โI want to wrap everything up,โ it is advisable for managers not to dismiss this as merely a simple expression of emotion.
The first thing to check is Is it safe now? You must verify whether the employee is alone, if there is an immediate risk of self-harm, and if their physical condition or location is safe. If immediate danger is suspected, rather than general counseling guidance or in-house EAP guidance 119, 112, Suicide Prevention Hotline 109 Emergency routes take priority.
Managers should not evaluate employees' statements or dismiss them by saying, "That is difficult for anyone." Furthermore, rather than promising not to tell anyone, it is better to inform them that the information may be shared with HR or a designated crisis response officer to the minimum extent necessary to ensure safety.
The key point is Confirm crisis expression โ Verify current safety โ Do not leave alone โ Report to designated person in charge โ Connect with external crisis resources โ Record minimum facts โ Post-crisis verification It is to create a flow.
When will it be applied?
When an employee expresses a crisis, procedures for reporting to and coordinating with a manager are required in the following situations.
Even if the wording of the crisis is ambiguous, it is advisable for a manager to first determine if "a safety check is currently required" rather than closing the call based on a unilateral judgment. Immediate response may be necessary, particularly if the possibility of suicide or self-harm is directly mentioned, or if there is a risk of being out of contact, intoxication, extreme agitation, or violence.
What managers and HR personnel need to do
STEP 01
1. We do not take expressions of crisis lightly.
When an employee expresses a sense of crisis, the first reaction to avoid is dismissing it by thinking, "They probably just said that because they are having a hard time."
Of course, not all expressions of crisis may imply an immediate risk of self-harm. However, since managers are not clinical judges, rather than attempting to determine the sincerity of the expression Signal requiring safety verification It is best to accept it as such.
For example, it is advisable not to overlook expressions like the following without recording them in an interview or reporting them.
At this stage, the manager's role is not to present a solution, but to ensure that risks are not overlooked and to lead to the next connection.
STEP 02
2. Check the current safety status.
If you hear a crisis expression, you should first verify the current situation. It is better to keep questions short and clear rather than making them too complex.
For example, you can ask as follows.
Are you alone right now?
Do you feel that there is a risk of harming yourself right now?
Could you let me know your current location?
Would it be okay if I connected you with help right now?
In this situation, if the employee avoids answering, becomes unreachable, or repeatedly expresses distress while claiming to be "okay," it is advisable for the manager not to terminate the call alone. If necessary, the information should be shared immediately through designated internal channels, such as HR, the health manager, the internal crisis response manager, and the security manager.
However, it is advisable to avoid asking employees for unnecessarily detailed personal information, medical history, family relationships, or diagnoses. You should focus on the minimum information necessary to verify safety.
STEP 03
3. If there is an immediate danger, prioritize the emergency route.
If an employee states that they are at immediate risk of self-harm, is unreachable, difficult to locate, or if physical danger is suspected, it is best not to postpone the EAP counseling appointment or the meeting until the next day.
In this case, you must first review the following path.
In emergency situations, it is better for managers to respond by prioritizing safety rather than waiting to verify all the facts before taking action. In a crisis, the decision to "wait and see a little longer" can escalate the risk.
STEP 04
4. Do not handle this alone; report to the designated person in charge.
If a manager responds to a crisis alone, the burden increases, and important measures may be overlooked. If there are established reporting channels within the company, such as crisis response personnel, HR personnel, health managers, safety and health personnel, and grievance counselors, it is advisable to follow those procedures.
When reporting, do not share employees' private lives extensively; instead, organize the report focusing on the facts necessary for safety response.
The report wording can be organized as follows.
During today's meeting, the employee made remarks implying a possibility of self-harm, and it is deemed necessary to verify their current safety. Please review the safety verification and determine whether external coordination is required, excluding specific details regarding the employee's private life.
In this case, even if an employee asks not to tell anyone, reporting and coordination may be necessary to the minimum extent required if there is a concern for life and safety. However, the recipients of the information must be limited as much as possible.
STEP 05
5. We provide guidance distinguishing between external crisis resources and EAP.
The mere presence of a crisis expression should not lead to the sole use of EAP in every situation. While EAP is a complementary channel that supports the psychological well-being and recovery of members, it does not replace emergency response to immediate life or physical danger.
Rather than saying, โIt will be resolved if you receive EAP counseling,โ administrators should guide people by distinguishing the appropriate path for the situation. In particular, if there are indications of suicide or self-harm, it is safer to first guide people to immediately accessible routes such as 109, 119, or 112.
STEP 06
6. Record only necessary facts and limit the scope of sharing.
Since crisis response records may contain sensitive employee information, the purpose of the records must be clearly defined. The purpose is not for evaluation or disciplinary action, but to ensure safety and prevent the omission of follow-up support.
It is recommended to leave the following information in the record.
For example, avoid expressions that are close to a diagnosis, such as โappears to have depression,โ and instead write based on facts and actions, such as โreported to HR and referred to 109 counseling as there were expressions during the interview suggesting the possibility of self-harm.โ
Management table example
The table below provides examples of internal management measures to ensure managers and HR personnel do not miss follow-up actions when an employee expresses a crisis. The actual items should be adjusted to align with your company's crisis response system, personal information protection standards, and health management system.
Checklist
The checklist below is for internal inspection purposes to ensure that managers do not miss safety checks, reporting, coordination, or records when an employee expresses a crisis.
especially Verify current safety, do not leave alone, report to designated person in charge, connect with external crisis resources. These are basic verification items. If even one of these items is not resolved, it is recommended to address it first rather than considering the response complete.
Among all items If 3 or more are insufficient It is advisable to review crisis response standards, reporting systems, and follow-up procedures rather than leaving it solely to the judgment of individual managers.
Common mistakes
The first mistake is dismissing crisis expressions as mere jokes or temporary emotions.
Even if the employee does not express it directly, if expressions of deep despair, such as "I want to disappear" or "I want to clear everything out," are repeated, a safety check may be necessary.
The second mistake is for the manager to try to persuade alone.
Since administrators are not counseling experts or medical professionals, it is advisable to focus on ensuring safety and connecting with professional channels rather than attempting in-depth counseling.
The third mistake is promising โI wonโt tell anyone.โ
If there is a concern for life and safety, you may need to share information with HR or crisis response personnel to the minimum extent necessary. In this case, it is advisable to explain to employees that you will share the information restrictively, stating, "For the sake of safety, we will share it only with those who need it."
The fourth mistake is ending the response after only providing EAP guidance.
EAP is an important supplementary channel, but in cases of immediate risk of suicide or self-harm, emergency routes such as 109, 119, and 112 are the priority.
The fifth mistake is widely sharing the content of the crisis expression with many people.
Since crisis response records are sensitive information, sharing should be restricted to relevant personnel rather than to all department heads or via group messengers.
If EAP support is needed
EAP does not replace emergency rescue, medical judgment, mental health diagnosis, or legal action by the company regarding risks of suicide or self-harm. In particular, if there is an immediate concern for life or physical safety, you must first provide information on immediately accessible routes such as 119, 112, or the suicide prevention hotline 109.
However, once the crisis situation has stabilized, EAP can be utilized as a supplementary channel. If an employee is experiencing work stress, interpersonal conflict, anxiety following a harassment report, the burden of returning to work, or recurring feelings of helplessness, EAP counseling can help reduce emotional burden and support subsequent recovery.
EAP guidance text can be used as follows.
In crisis situations requiring immediate safety verification, you must prioritize the use of emergency channels such as 119, 112, or the Suicide Prevention Hotline 109. Subsequently, if counseling is needed due to psychological distress, anxiety, job stress, or relationship conflicts, you may utilize EAP counseling channels. EAP does not replace emergency rescue or medical judgment; it is a supplementary channel designed to support members with psychological burdens.
Related Posts
Workplace Suicide Prevention and Mental Health Education Guide โ Suicide Risk Signal HR Crisis Response Standards Checklist โ What should I do if I hear remarks implying self-harm? โ Information and Checklist to Prepare Before Inquiring about Crisis Counseling โFrequently Asked Questions
Q1. What should you do if an employee says, โI want to die,โ but immediately claims, โIt was a jokeโ?
Even if you dismiss it as a joke, it is best not to end the conversation immediately. Briefly check if they are currently safe, alone, and need help, and if necessary, share the information with HR or a designated contact to the minimum extent possible. If the conversation involves repetitive phrases, it is safer to schedule a follow-up.
Q2. If an employee tells me not to tell anyone, am I not allowed to report it?
Confidentiality is crucial for general grievances or counseling matters. However, if there is a concern regarding life or physical safety, information may need to be shared with HR, health managers, and crisis response personnel to the minimum extent necessary. In such cases, it is advisable to limit the information to only those essential for ensuring safety, rather than sharing it widely.
Q3. Can an administrator call 109 directly?
If an employee agrees and can consult directly, it is best to help them connect to 109. If an employee is unable to make a call or if immediate danger is suspected, managers or HR can review emergency routes such as 119 or 112 as appropriate for the situation. If the company has internal crisis response standards, those procedures must also be reviewed.
Q4. How much information should be shared with the team leader of the employee who expressed a sense of crisis?
It is advisable to share only the minimum information necessary for work coordination or safety verification with the team leader. Specific counseling details, personal life, estimated diagnoses, and family issues should not be widely shared. The purpose of sharing should be to ensure safety and make necessary work-related adjustments, not for evaluation.
Q5. If EAP counseling has been provided, is the company's action complete?
That is not the case. EAP guidance is one form of follow-up support. In the event of a crisis expression, it is recommended to manage safety verification, internal reporting, linking with external crisis resources if necessary, minimum documentation, and post-incident verification together. In cases of emergency risk, immediately accessible channels such as 119, 112, or 109 take priority over EAP.
Next step
When an employee expresses a crisis, the key to the response is not for the manager to solve all the problems. The manager Safety verification, reporting, coordination, record You must ensure that you do not lose the flow.
First, it is recommended to organize the following three points within the organization.
If you wish to revise suicide prevention and mental health education, manager response manuals, and EAP counseling linkage standards at the organizational level, review the operational methods suitable for your organization through Nudge EAP implementation counseling.
๐ Go to Nudge EAP Implementation Consultation โSource and Information
โข Health and Welfare Counseling Center, Suicide Prevention Hotline 109
โข Health and Welfare Counseling Center, Suicide Prevention Hotline Frequently Asked Questions
โข WHO, Guidelines on mental health at work
โข WHO, Preventing suicide at work: information for employers, managers and employees
โข HSE, Stress and mental health at work
โข Ministry of Employment and Labor, Free Support for Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
โข Health and Welfare Counseling Center, Suicide Prevention Hotline Frequently Asked Questions
โข WHO, Guidelines on mental health at work
โข WHO, Preventing suicide at work: information for employers, managers and employees
โข HSE, Stress and mental health at work
โข Ministry of Employment and Labor, Free Support for Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
This content is intended for general informational purposes. Specific legal matters, labor issues, occupational safety and health, mental health, psychological counseling, and crisis response matters may vary depending on the workplace situation, the latest laws, and official guidelines; therefore, review by relevant experts or agencies may be necessary. In cases involving indications of suicide or self-harm, immediate safety risks, or risks of violence, do not respond solely based on general counseling guidance; instead, prioritize checking emergency channels such as 119, 112, or the Suicide Prevention Hotline 109.
Comments5
Most Engaging Posts in the Community
- 0160026.10.22
- 0260026.10.22
- 03CommentsWe also have a lot of short-term contract workers during peak season, so I get confused every time I have to handle the training for rehired employees. I'm also curious how other places handle cases where contracts are renewed immediately without any gaps.132226.10.21
- 01coach AnswerHello, this is Nudge EAP โบ๏ธ You should group tasks based on whether the actual work type and conditions are the same, rather than the process name. Tasks can be considered the same if the worker posture, number of repetitions and time, handling weight and frequency, movement, and equipment and tools are similar. Therefore, even within the same assembly process, it is better to separate "seated assembly" and "standing assembly while moving materials" into separate tasks. First, list the detailed tasks within the process and compare them using the criteria above; separating only the tasks with significant differences makes organization easier, even with a large workforce. If there are multiple tasks under the same conditions, you can select a representative sample that includes the worker with the highest workload. The KOSHA guide suggests using at least two tasks with high work intensity as a sample when there are 10 or fewer identical tasks. Shifts can be grouped together if the equipment, workload, speed, and personnel are the same, but if the conditions differ, please separate them by shift. For rotation workers, you can make a judgment by recording all detailed tasks performed during the day, along with the time and frequency of each. For the final classification, confirm the opinions of on-site workers, and if you record the basis for the grouping on the survey form, it will be easier to explain during inspections.753326.09.18
- 02CommentsThe distinction between receiving a report and reaching a conclusion is important. Global HR teams should secure immediate protection and confidentiality before trying to decide whether the conduct legally qualifies as harassment.734426.09.02
- 03coach AnswerHello, this is Nudge EAP.โบ๏ธ The simplest method is for employees to simply receive guidance and apply directly, as the company does not transfer personal information. If you want a health manager to forward a name and contact information to an EAP agency for contact, it is safer to explain the receiving agency, purpose, items, retention period, and the right to refuse consent, and to obtain clear consent from the individual. Since checkup results and symptoms are sensitive health information, do not consider them included in the existing health checkup consent; instead, please write down only the content to be conveyed and obtain separate consent. In practice, it is common to separate the options into โ consent for forwarding name and contact information and โก consent for forwarding checkup results and symptoms, ensuring that there is no disadvantage in using the EAP even if the second option is not agreed to. The burden of repeating explanations can be reduced by providing the option for employees to send a summary of their consultation request, written directly by the employee, to the agency. However, since the wording and procedures may vary depending on whether the contract with the EAP agency involves the outsourcing of personal information processing or the provision of information to a third party, please review the contract details with your in-house personal information manager before implementation. It is a good idea to define the scope of responses in advance to the company to prevent unnecessary feedback regarding consultation requests or their content.668926.09.21
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10