Office Risk Assessment in Korea: A Practical Checklist for Global HR and EHS
Office Risk Assessment in Korea: A Practical Checklist for Global HR and EHS
Global office safety templates usually cover fire exits, cables and chairs. Korean rules add a few items they rarely include: indoor air reference values, protection for customer-facing staff, rest facilities, and since June 2026 specific evidence of worker participation and communication. This checklist is built for HR and EHS teams that run a Korean office from a regional or global seat.
An office-only entity in Korea still has to carry out risk assessment under Article 36 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. The office-only exemption in Schedule 1 of the Enforcement Decree removes the provisions on safety and health management structure, management regulations, training and some contractor duties, not Article 36. Since 1 June 2026 the Act and Enforcement Rule spell out worker participation, sharing the schedule and results with workers, and three-year retention of defined records. Administrative fines for these duties start on 1 January 2027 for entities with 50 or more regular workers and 1 January 2028 for smaller ones.
🧭 Where global office templates fall short in Korea
Most multinational office checklists are written around a generic hazard list. They are a good starting point, but a Korean inspection or an internal audit will look for a few items that are specific to Korean rules or practice.
| Typical global template | Korean-specific addition | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Workstation ergonomics self-assessment | Screen at least 40 cm from the eyes, line of sight 10-15° below horizontal, adjustable desk and chair, glare control; identify roles with 4+ hours of concentrated keyboard work a day as potential burdening work | VDT Guidelines Art. 6; OSH Standards Rule Art. 667, 657 |
| Lighting adequate: yes/no | Statutory minimum illuminance (150 lux for ordinary work) plus VDT guidance of 300-500 lux (dark screens) or 500-700 lux (bright screens) | OSH Standards Rule Art. 8; VDT Guidelines Art. 7 |
| HVAC maintained by landlord | Office air reference values (e.g. CO2 1,000 ppm, PM2.5 50 µg/m³, formaldehyde 100 µg/m³; radon 148 Bq/m³ for basement offices) | OSH Standards Rule Arts. 646-655; Office Air Quality Guidelines |
| Workplace violence policy | Measures for customer-facing workers: posted or recorded notice against abusive language, a response manual, training, and temporary suspension or change of work when harm occurs | OSH Act Art. 41; Enforcement Rule Art. 41 |
| Break room (optional amenity) | Rest facilities are required; entities with 20+ regular workers (or 10+ with certain roles such as call-centre or cleaning staff) must meet installation and management standards | OSH Act Art. 128-2; Enforcement Decree Art. 96-2 |
| Stress covered by wellbeing programme | Job stress measures for high-stress work, such as evaluating stressors and allocating work and rest | OSH Standards Rule Art. 669 |
| Annual review by regional EHS | Workers must take part, usually through a site walk; the workers' representative must be included on request | OSH Act Art. 36(2)-(3); Enforcement Rule Art. 37-2 |
🆕 The 2026 timeline at a glance
| Date | What happens | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 1 June 2026 | Amended Article 36 in force: full cycle (identify, decide acceptability, set and implement improvements), worker and representative participation, communication to workers, record retention | OSH Act Art. 36; Enforcement Rule Arts. 37-37-4 |
| 23 Sep 2026 | Fully revised risk assessment guidelines pre-announced; current guidelines (Notice No. 2024-76) remain in force until a new notice is issued | MOEL pre-announcement |
| 1 Jan 2027 | Fines apply to entities with 50+ regular workers: failure to assess KRW 5m / 7m / 10m; no worker participation or no communication KRW 1.5m / 3m / 5m; records not kept KRW 0.5m / 1.5m / 3m (1st / 2nd / 3rd+) | Enforcement Decree Schedule 35 |
| 1 Jan 2028 | Same fines apply to entities with fewer than 50 regular workers (size-based reductions apply) | Enforcement Decree Schedule 35 |
There is no criminal penalty attached to Article 36 itself. For a Korean office with five or more workers, however, risk assessment records also serve as evidence for the Serious Accidents Punishment Act duty to identify and improve hazards and check the process at least every half year (Enforcement Decree Art. 4(3)), so the practical stakes are higher than the fine amounts suggest.
✅ The office checklist
Use the list below as a walk-through sheet. Mark each line as adequate, needs action or not applicable, and add an owner and a due date to anything that needs action. The evidence column is what you would want to show if asked.
| Area | What to check | Evidence to keep |
|---|---|---|
| Floors, corridors, stairs | Trailing cables, boxes in walkways, wet entrances on rainy days, stair lighting | Walk-through sheet with photos |
| Storage and shelving | Heavy boxes on top shelves, unsecured cabinets, staff standing on chairs | Fix list with completion dates |
| Workstations | Screen distance and height, adjustable chairs, glare, laptop-only users | Workstation check results (aggregated) |
| High-volume data entry roles | Concentrated keyboard and mouse work of 4+ hours a day | Role list and ergonomic review |
| Lighting | Measured or estimated illuminance at desks and in meeting rooms | Lux readings or facility report |
| Air quality and ventilation | Ventilation running, stuffy rooms, printer rooms, basement areas | Building management data or measurements |
| Electrical and fire | Daisy-chained power strips, personal heaters, blocked exits, extinguishers | Facility inspection record |
| Pantry | Hot water dispensers, wet floors, knives and glass | Walk-through sheet |
| Manual handling | Paper boxes, water bottles, deliveries; trolleys available | Walk-through sheet |
| Customer-facing teams | Notice against abusive language, response manual, escalation and pause rules | Manual, training record, posted notice |
| Workload and hours | Peak periods, overtime patterns, single-person roles, ability to take breaks | Aggregated survey results, actions agreed |
| Rest facilities | Available, usable, meeting standards if your headcount triggers them | Facility description and check |
👥 Participation and communication: what the new rules expect
- Participation. The default method is a site walk with workers. Surveys and interviews can be added, or used instead only when a walk is not possible for a specific reason (Enforcement Rule Art. 37-2). A short walk per floor with one or two employees, plus a three-question survey to everyone, covers most offices.
- Before the assessment. Tell workers when it will take place (Enforcement Rule Art. 37-3).
- After the assessment. Share the hazards found, how risk was decided, the improvements planned and what was implemented, through training, a briefing, a posting, or written or electronic means (OSH Act Art. 36(4)).
- Records. Keep the timing and person in charge, the workers and representative who took part, and the shared results for three years (Enforcement Rule Art. 37-4).
We found no provision in Article 36, the Enforcement Rule or the guidelines that requires records to be written in Korean. Because the point of the duty is that workers understand and take part, a Korean version of the notice and results is the safer practice for a Korean workforce, even if your master file is in English.
🗓️ Running it in four weeks
- Week 1: confirm scope (office-only or mixed site, contractors such as cleaning and security), appoint an owner, choose a method. The guidelines accept a checklist method or a three-level (high, medium, low) method, which suit most offices.
- Week 2: announce the schedule, run the floor walks with employees, send the short survey, collect accident and near-miss records.
- Week 3: decide risk levels, agree improvements with owners and dates, fix quick items immediately, and send landlord-related items to building management in writing.
- Week 4: share results with all staff in Korean, file the record set, and put the annual reassessment and change triggers (office move, refurbishment, reorganisation) in the calendar.
💬 How EAP supports employees and HR
In office surveys, the most frequent answers are often about workload, difficult customers and not being able to switch off, rather than trips and falls. Organisational fixes such as workload allocation and response manuals belong in the improvement plan. For the individual side, an Employee Assistance Programme gives employees a confidential place to talk. Keep EAP usage and counselling content separate from risk assessment records.
❓ FAQ
Our Korean entity has eight employees in a serviced office. Is a full assessment really needed?
The duty applies regardless of size. Under the guidelines, workplaces with fewer than five regular workers can skip the preparation step, and any small office can use a simple checklist or three-level method. What matters is participation, communication and three-year records.
Can our regional EHS team run the assessment remotely?
Regional teams can design the method and review results, but the Enforcement Rule expects workers to take part, normally through a site walk. Plan for someone on site in Korea to walk the office with employees.
Does the office air guideline mean we must measure air quality every year?
The OSH Standards Rule requires measurement and evaluation when necessary rather than on a fixed cycle. Building management data is often enough to start with; consider measuring where employees report stuffiness, headaches or odours, and in basement offices.
Is our global ISO 45001 assessment enough?
It can be the basis, provided the Korean entity's record shows worker participation through a site walk, communication of the schedule and results, and the items listed in Enforcement Rule Art. 37-4. Map those fields before relying on a global tool.
🔗 Related guides
👉 Next step
If your office assessment points to workload, customer pressure or stress, a confidential counselling channel helps employees while you work on the organisational fixes. Talk to us about EAP support for your Korean entity.
Contact us about EAP →📚 Sources
- Korean Law Information Center · Occupational Safety and Health Act, Article 36 (amended, effective 1 June 2026)
- Korean Law Information Center · OSH Act Enforcement Decree, Schedule 1 and Schedule 35
- Korean Law Information Center · OSH Act Enforcement Rule, Articles 37 to 37-4
- Korean Law Information Center · Guidelines on Workplace Risk Assessment (MOEL Notice No. 2024-76)
- Korean Law Information Center · Rules on OSH Standards, Articles 3, 8, 646-655, 667 and 669
- Korean Law Information Center · VDT Work Management Guidelines (MOEL Notice No. 2020-17)
- Korean Law Information Center · Office Air Quality Management Guidelines (MOEL Notice No. 2020-45)
- Korean Law Information Center · Serious Accidents Punishment Act Enforcement Decree, Article 4
- Ministry of Employment and Labor · Pre-announcement of the fully revised risk assessment guidelines (23 Sep 2026)
This article is practical guidance for planning an office risk assessment in Korea and is not legal advice. The checklist is an example, not a statutory form. Fine amounts are those set for application from 1 January 2027 (1 January 2028 for entities with fewer than 50 regular workers), and the risk assessment guidelines are under revision, so confirm the final text before relying on details. Legal sources checked on 15 October 2026.
커뮤니티에서 반응 좋은 글
- 0160026.10.22
- 0260026.10.22
- 03댓글저희도 성수기 단기 계약직이 많아서 재입사자 교육 처리할 때마다 헷갈려요ㅠ 공백 없이 바로 갱신되는 경우는 다른 곳은 어떻게 하시는지 저도 궁금합니다132226.10.21
- 01EAP전문가 답변안녕하세요, 넛지EAP 입니다☺️ 공정명보다는 실제 작업형태와 작업조건이 같은지를 기준으로 묶어보시면 됩니다. 작업자세, 반복횟수·시간, 취급 중량과 횟수, 이동 여부, 설비·공구가 비슷해야 같은 작업으로 볼 수 있어요. 따라서 같은 조립공정이라도 ‘앉아서 조립’과 ‘서서 조립하며 자재 이동’은 별도 작업으로 나누는 편이 좋습니다. 먼저 공정 안의 세부작업을 적고 위 항목을 비교한 뒤, 차이가 큰 작업만 분리하면 인원이 많아도 정리하기 수월해요. 같은 조건의 작업이 여러 개라면 부담이 가장 큰 작업자를 포함해 대표 표본을 선정할 수 있습니다. KOSHA 가이드에서는 동일작업이 10개 이하일 때 작업강도가 높은 2개 이상을 표본으로 제시하고 있어요. 교대조는 설비·작업량·속도·인원이 같으면 함께 볼 수 있지만, 조건이 다르면 교대별로 나누세요. 로테이션 작업자는 하루 동안 수행하는 모든 세부작업과 각각의 시간·횟수를 함께 기록해 판단하시면 됩니다. 최종 분류는 현장 근로자 의견을 확인하고, 묶은 근거를 조사표에 남겨두시면 점검 때도 설명하기 좋습니다.753326.09.18
- 02댓글보고서를 접수하는 것과 결론에 도달하는 것 사이의 차이는 중요합니다. 글로벌 인사팀은 해당 행위가 법적으로 괴롭힘에 해당하는지 여부를 판단하기 전에 즉각적인 보호 조치와 기밀 유지를 확보해야 합니다.734426.09.02
- 03EAP전문가 답변안녕하세요, 넛지EAP 입니다☺️ 직원이 안내만 받고 직접 신청하면 회사가 개인정보를 넘기지 않으므로 가장 간단합니다. 보건관리자가 이름·연락처를 EAP 기관에 전달해 연락받게 하려면, 제공받는 기관·목적·항목·보유기간·동의 거부 권리를 안내하고 본인의 명확한 동의를 받는 방식이 안전해요. 검진 결과나 증상은 건강에 관한 민감정보이므로 기존 건강검진 동의에 포함됐다고 보지 말고, 전달할 내용만 적어 별도로 동의받아 주세요. 실무에서는 ① 이름·연락처 전달 동의와 ② 검진 결과·증상 전달 동의를 나눠 선택하게 하고, 두 번째에 동의하지 않아도 EAP 이용에는 불이익이 없도록 운영하는 경우가 많습니다. 같은 설명을 반복하는 부담은 직원이 직접 작성한 상담요청 요약문을 기관에 보내도록 선택지를 주면 줄일 수 있어요. 다만 EAP 기관과의 계약이 개인정보 처리위탁인지 제3자 제공인지에 따라 문구와 절차가 달라질 수 있으니, 시행 전 사내 개인정보 담당자와 계약 내용을 함께 확인해 주세요. 회사에는 상담 신청 여부나 내용이 불필요하게 돌아오지 않도록 회신 범위도 미리 정해두시면 좋습니다.718926.09.21
- 04
복직 전 보건관리자와 부서장 면담을 모두 진행하시나요?[3]
112226.10.20 - 05
복직 전 확인사항 역할표|인사·보건관리자·부서장·의료진[3]
103326.10.20 - 06
건강상 휴직자의 복직 전 절차|소견서·면담·업무적합성 판단의 역할 구분[4]
154426.10.20 - 07
13년째 이어 온 기업 EAP, 이용자 27명에서 46명으로|IT 서비스 기업 470명 장기 운영 사례[3]
141026.10.19 - 08
걷기 챌린지 결과 보고서 양식|참여율·달성률·일자별 흐름을 자동 계산하는 엑셀 집계표[2]
100026.10.19 - 09
찾아가는 심리상담, 응답자 64%가 첫 상담이었습니다|스트레스 검진과 함께 연 현장 상담 3곳 운영 사례[3]
141026.10.19 - 10
- 04
작업환경측정 결과 후 개선 우선순위를 정하는 기준[5]
654426.09.02 - 05
괴롭힘 조사 대상자가 해외출장 중이면 비대면으로 면담해도 될까요?[8]
656626.09.22 - 06
EAP 제안서에서 상담사 배정 기준은 어떤걸 비교해보시나요?[10]
618826.09.22 - 07
EAP 견적을 받을 때 직원 수 외에 어떤 정보를 준비해야 하나요?[6]
574426.09.01 - 08
EAP 도입 TF에서 HR·보건·구매·법무 역할을 어떻게 나누나요?[5]
544426.09.01 - 09
괴롭힘 조사에서 메신저·이메일 증거 원본을 보존하는 방법[7]
545326.09.11 - 10
한국 연휴 기간 중 직원 지원 프로그램(EAP) 및 위기 지원 계획 수립[7]
474426.09.11